← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 454 (not an original page number)
Unit 454 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
872/73: FROM THE “JUNE REFORM” TO
THE FIRST GENERAL CONFERENCE
1. The Molotschna M.B. Church
a) We have seen how the Molotschna Church, 256 which was §204
actually the mother church of the M.B. Church, overcame the excesses of
the “over-joyous” and the "strong.” And we have discovered how all the
non-partisan believers and non-partisan, Christ-oriented members of the
South-Russian Mennonite Brotherhood in the Molotschna District,
foremost among them the ministers of the Ohrloff-Halbstadt Church and
a few leaders from the recently -established “Temple Church” which had
not as yet departed from the confessional foundations of ecumenical
Christianity nor from the character of sound, evangelical Pietism,
received her (the Mennonite Brethren Church) with affection, sympathy,
and highest espectations in consequence of this, her victory. Many of
468
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
these good expectations were vindicated; and where, in this time of ours,
were all hopes fulfilled?
b) Supervisory Council. We have already listed and characterized
the men who came to the side of the physically ailing first minister
Huebert, in 1866/66, to support and encourage him (cf. above #184 and
#188, “Growth in Sad Times,” etc.). In the fall of 1865, Christian Schmidt
and Jakob Jantz were already appointed as Huebert’s assistant teacher
and associate leader respectively. Johann J. Fast from Halbstadt,
previously from Schoenau (passed away in Rueckenau), had previously
been elected to the diaconate and, after Br. Jakob Jantz had moved to
the Ekaterinoslav area as co-founder of the colony and of the
Friedensfeld M.B. Church (46 versts from Nikopol) and Br. Christian
Schmidt to the Kuban, Fast was named assistant minister and associate
leader. Daniel Fast was Br. Huebert’s “baptizer” and general assistant
until he too moved to the Kuban about the same time (or somewhat
earlier) that J. Jantz went to Ekaterinoslav. Br. Philipp Isaak, who held
no spiritual title, was always and everywhere Huebert’s co-worker, and
he constantly remained an active member of the church. Everyone loved,
sympathized with, and respected the quiet, tender, and deeply insightful
elder. The stable character and sound Christian attitude of all these
leading brethren who understood each other well, became the means, by
God’s grace, by which the Molotschna congregation was able to maintain
itself in good order and by which it could experience rich spiritual growth
after 1865/66 (when the “Hermann Peters Brethren” made the final
break with the church). The M.B. Church in the Molotschna was
strengthened significantly by the appointment of the relatively very
young but very sincere Br. Abraham Schellenberg as assistant mini ster
in the summer of 1869. Brother Johann J. Fast and Abraham
Schellenberg remained with the church when Heinrich Huebert was
finally able to fulfill the desire he had had for ten years to move to the
Kuban (1873), where the church
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…