Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 457 (not an original page number)

Unit 457 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
[Elder of the Alexanderwohl Church], Toews [Elder of the Lichtenau-Petershagen Church, succeed- ing Duerk Warkentin], Goerz [Franz, Elder of the Rudnerweide Church succeeding Ratzlaff who had already retired], Peters [Bernhard, Elder of the Morgenau-Schoensee Church, succeeding Heinrich Wiens after a long vacancy], Peters [Isaak, successor to Heinrich Toews, Pordenau, and still living in America], Thomsen, Rempel [the latter two ministers in Gnadenfeld, replacing the sickly Elder Lenzmann].” This document should be compared with #J08f. 2) “The Halbstadt Area Administration to the Inspector of the colonies: In response to Your Honor’s instructions of last October 23, No. 692, the Molotschna Area Administrative Office hereby most humbly reports to Your Honor in the enclosed submission that the administrative Molotschna and Kuban 1865-73 471 office had made inquiry not only to individual religious leaders but to the Molotschna Mennonite Council of Church Leaders whether the baptism of F. performed by Reimer was in keeping with Scriptural precept and is duly recognized. "But because the Molotschna Mennonite Colony is divided into a number of church parishes and each has its own particular church elder, the elders deliberated concerning this issue at a general conference. As is obvious, however, the church elders were not able to arrive at a general consensus; therefore six church elders 262 submitted an explanation the substance of which stated that the baptism had not been performed according to Scripture, whereas the church elder Johann Harder with five of his minis ters maintained the opposite in another explanation. As was mentioned earlier, there is a council of church leaders in the Molotschna District, which is made up of representatives from the various churches, each of which is supervised by a particular church elder. The church elders are all of equal rank and their declarations are regarded equally before the law. Which of the two explanations was the right one or the one on which a final decision was to be based could not be determined 263 by this area administration because the issue was of a purely spiritual nature. Rather it could only state that a similar separatist church 264 had already been founded here earlier. Its elder had been confirmed by the church itself and also recognized by all other churches and also by the government. June [?], 1868. Administrator, Toews.” 3) "Brief statement of the rules and regulations of our church. [Submitted by Elder Heinrich Huebert in the above mentioned matter, representing the Molotschna M.B. Church., June, 1868.] a) “On the occasion of an enquiry by the supreme government directed to the church elders of the Molotschna Mennonite District: 1. Whether the baptism of Johann F., performed by the Minister Jakob Reimer, has come to the attention of the Mennonite clergy? 2. Whether the baptism was registered in the church records and when? Whe

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…