← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 458 (not an original page number)
Unit 458 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
reupon
certain church elders declared: ‘We do not know.’ Thus we find it
necessary to use this occasion to openly publish the rules and external
regulations of our church. How it is possible that these same elders [i.e.
their predecessors] who, in 1860, believed they had sufficient evidence
against us to warrant governmental prosecution, can answer the above
quoted simple questions of the governmental enquiry with “We do not
know”— we leave open for the consideration and verification of all
concerned. During the severe treatment by the [Mennonite] authorities,
our written explanations and defences were based on the Confession of
Faith published by the Rudnerweide Church, and passed by the Odessa
§205
472
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
censorship. Therefore, it has become public knowledge that we
propagate no new teaching, but our teaching is based on one already in
existence for 1800 years, that of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and His
apostles and prophets. It is upon this that we wish to establish and organize
our church; even fearing to add or take away from the book of prophecy,
lest we should bring upon ourselves, in the first place, the plagues that
are written therein, and in the second place, lose our part in the book of
life and the holy city (Rev. 22:18-19). Since the rules and external
regulations are included in the above-mentioned Confession of Faith, and
all those desirous of knowledge can be convinced, we propose to publish
herewith, only those points in which we differ from the rules and outward
regulations presently in effect in the existing churches.
b) “1. In our assemblies and inspirational meetings, we have tried to
follow the rule and order given in I Cor. 14, i.e., that one or two, or a
maximum of three persons present their lectures, and that in succession.
We recognize herein the loving purpose of the apostle: that the church be
edified, the gifts stirred up, and the saints prepared for the work of the
ministry, in order that the body of Christ may be built up, ‘till we all
come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God,
unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of
Christ, that we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and
carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and
cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive’ (Eph. 4:12-14).
“2. Regarding the receiving of new members, when persons come to
us and desire church membership through baptism, we examine their
testimony and Christian experience, how and when they came to a
knowledge of sin so that they, according to I Peter 3:21, are able to make
covenant of a good conscience with God. After they have given this
public testimony before the church, other witnesses are called to confirm
that, according to their human judgment, a genuine change of heart has
taken place. Upon the confession that they believe that Jesus Christ
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…