← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 466 (not an original page number)
Unit 466 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
s, an order dated May 6, 1880, came to the Chortitza Volost
§214
480
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
asking them to inform the authorized individuals 273 of the Einlage M.B.
Church that their members would be recognized and treated as
Mennonites by birth in the same way as members of the older Mennonite
churches. Thereby the enemies of the church had again been humiliated
and had not improved their image. “The Molotschna Mennonite officials
had acted more wisely on this issue and had perceived the root of the
issue more adequately” (Epp). (Cf. Confession of Faith 1900/1902, legal
German-Russian Addendum, pp. 56, 57.)
b) Since we do not have access to the document from 1880, we will
pass over a period of 16 years and quote a German translation of an
identical document. 274
§214(2) At the last moment, because of unexpected events concerning the
M.B. Church in another province we are able to bring the following
document in the original.
a) “The Ministry of the Interior of the Ekaterinoslav Provincial
Government, Department I, Table 2, March 22, 1880, No. 1074. To the
Ekaterinoslav District Police Office. In the process of gathering
information concerning the number of Baptists in the Ekaterinoslav
Province the Chortitza Volost administration included in the list of
Baptists several persons who consider themselves to be Mennonites. As
a result of complaints by church leaders about this report Minister
Johann Siemens, deacons Peter Friesen, Gerhard Sawatzky and Peter
Froese, Elder Aron Lepp and a member of the brotherhood, Abraham
Unger, have presented printed copies of their confession of faith, the
Hon. Governor of the Province requested on the 14th of January of this
year under No. 126 an explanation from the Department of Religious
Affairs concerning foreign confessions: ‘Is it proper to recognize such
persons as Baptists’? The Department of Religious Affairs upon
examining of the aforesaid request of the Hon. Governor of the Province
under No. 126 explained in a memorandum No. 936 on the 6th of March
of this year that, since the above-mentioned persons, having presented a
printed confession of faith in accordance with the teaching of the
Mennonite Brethren Church, deny that they belong to the sect of
Baptists,— he, therefore, does not find sufficient reason for the
transferring of such persons against their will from one tolerated
confession 275 to another one ; at the same time he added that religious
dissent of the above-mentioned persons from other Mennonites is
irrelevant, because according to article 903, Code of Laws, vol. XI, part I
Mennonites excercise matters of faith without obstruction according to
their church affiliation and customs.
“About this the Provincial Government, informing the Police Office
of it, orders that the above explanation be communicated to the
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
481
Chortitza Volost a dminis tration, and that the above-named persons be
notif
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…