← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 465 (not an original page number)
Unit 465 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he elders and ministers of all the M.B.
churches met and explained the differences between the M.B. Church,
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
479
the Baptists, and the Mennonite Church. When the particular draft had
been examined by the whole gathered congregation 272 it was sent to the
Ministry together with a particular Confession of Faith (a revision of the
Hamburg Confession which was adapted to the Mennonite teaching). In
1875 the church decided to print the Confession together with some
“Explanations.” It was printed in 1876 by Spittler in Basel. But because
the Confessions arrived from Basel precisely at the time when efforts
were being made to separate from the Baptists, the additional note
stating that they had fellowship with the Baptists was not favorably
received by many brethren and they regarded it to be unnecessary (Epp).
Even less acceptable was the language which described the relationship
to the Mennonite Church. It is a blemish on the record of the church of
that day and it is hard to imagine how the deceased Unger, who was so
sensitive and moderate, could permit such a thing. (Compare sections
201, 211 and 221 as well as the Confession of 1900/1902, pp. 5 and 6.)
7. Attempts of an Administrative Nature to I .ink the Einlage M.B.
Church to the Baptist Confession. (Substantially according to the
Heinrich Epp.)
a) When the Baptists received recognition as a branch of Pro-
testantism by an imperial decree on March 27, 1879 (codified as Articles
1106, 1107, 1108; Volume XI, Part I Collection of Laws of 1896), the
government wanted to know how many Baptists there were and where
they lived. Therefore an order from the government was received by the
Chortitza Volost to report on this matter. Thereupon the seceded
Mennonite brethren were all reckoned as Baptists. When the brethren
Jakob Koslowsky, Abraham Unger, and Johann Friesen, who all lived in
Einlage, became aware of this and inquired concerning the issue of the
area administrator, he replied that they should submit a request to
rectify the situation. Thereupon the Einlage congregation decided that
Br. Abraham Unger and Br. Abraham Lepp were to investigate the
matter. The brethren did their utmost. They reported from Ekaterinoslav
that the authorities were demanding that the Confession of Faith be
submitted in the Russian and the German languages. The completion of
the translation into Russian was submitted to Br. Johann Wieler, who at
that time was teacher at the Halbstadt Secondary School. He submitted
the translation to P. M. Friesen, the teacher of the Russian language in
this school, for revision. The brethren Unger, Lepp, Johann Siemens, and
J. Wieler also worked with P. M. Friesen in Halbstadt to formulate new
explanations concerning the relationship of the M.B. Church to the
Mennonite Church and the Baptists, as well as a petition to the Ministry
of the Interior (Epp). After these documents had been presented to the
authoritie
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…