← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 473 (not an original page number)
Unit 473 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ad to the neighboring village of Steinau. (Br.
Siemens lived in Blumenfeld.) Here he had to escape from one house to
which he had been invited, “amid clubs, but the Lord stayed their
hands.” This took place in February of 1879, and in May, 1880, five con-
verted souls from this village were baptized. Further awakenings, conver-
sions and baptisms took place. In May, 1881, an itinerant minister who was
visiting the brethren was taken to the state police official (Stanovoi),
who released him without further ado. “Then our village of Blumenfeld
made an effort, if possible, to force us out of the village;” but since that
was impossible, the village congregation filed a complaint in court. The
investigation, however, resulted in a decision in favor of the brethren,
and the village administration was ordered to let the brethren conduct
their meetings without disturbance; an attempt to make “Baptists” out
of them also foundered. Meanwhile, the following incidents occurred :
"We had assembled in our village, with Brother Christian Schmidt from
the Kuban also in our midst. Just as he was beginning to speak about
the Word: He came unto His own and His own received Him not, our
enemies kicked open the door and forced us to disperse, and that very
evening, our Brother Schmidt had to flee to another village. This
happened in February, 1882. Later in the same month, we had
assembled later one evening. Then the village administrators came with
a considerable number of neighbors, and brought with them a man who
possessed the power of Satan, to attack us. He took a brother from our
midst and choked and tormented him as he took him to the mayor. Well,
the Lord be praised that we were counted worthy to suffer a little.” The
animosity soon subsided, and thanks to the decision of the authorities, the
brethren were allowed to practice their faith unmolested by the village
administration and their neighbors. Late in 1884, there were 38 brethren
and sisters in this settlement. The report is signed: Blumenfeld, October
29, 1884. Gerhard Siemens.
10. Up to January 6, 1885, the twenty-fifth anniversary of the
Mennonite Brethren Church, 264 the Einlage Church (dating from March
1862) and its affiliated groups had received 704 persons through
baptism, namely 202 during the first five years, from 1862 to 1866; 49
from 1867 to 1871; 184 from 1872 to 1884. The highest number was added
§217
490
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
during the first year, 1862, with 116; the lowest— 1874: 1. The second
highest number was added in 1879, with 73, the second lowest in 1867:
2. Fifty-four were received into membership during the current year,
1886 (1886, the actual anniversary year for the Einlage Church, had 238,
and the last half-decade, 1882-1886: 376). Its membership on the
anniversary, January 6, 1885— must have been over 500 of the ca. 1800
in the entire conference.
B. The Molotschna Mennonite Brethren Church, 1872/73 to 1885
§2
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…