← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 474 (not an original page number)
Unit 474 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
18 1. During this period it was essentially the brethren Johanfi J. Fast
and Abraham Schellenberg who had a formative influence on the church,
and, for a time, Christian Schmidt, 285 Philipp Isaak, David Schellenberg
and Johann Wieler as well. (Johann Wieler was a teacher in
the secondary school at Halbstadt from 1879 to 1883, after which
he served as an itinerant minister for several years with the "Petersburg
Brethren,” especially with Colonel Paschkov and the Russian evangelicals.
He did this without the consent of the M.B. Conference. Later he went
to Rumania, where he died in Bucharest in 1890.) Again we make free
use of the reminiscences of Br. David Schellenberg and others. Elder
Heinrich Huebert, who had lived in Blumenort a number of years, settled
in the Kuban permanently in 1873. In his place Br. Abraham
Schellenberg, who had become more and more active in teaching and
leading since his call to the ministry in 1869, was elected to the position
of associate elder.
§219 2a. The work of the church thus progressed under the blessing of
God for the next six years. Abraham Schellenberg ’s faithful co-workers
where Johann J. Fast, Johann Regehr (Klippenfeld), and Johann
Poettker (Fuerstenau) as ministers, and Franz Janzen (Pordenau) and
Cornelius Neufeld (Neukirch) as deacons, and Philipp Isaak. "During
these years there were many difficulties, but also times of great
blessings.” In the autumn of 1875 Abraham Schellenberg was elected
elder, and in the spring of 1876 Elder Huebert of the Kuban ordained
him.
§220 2b. The land controversy between those owning little or no land and
those having full or partial landholding rights occasioned a great deal of
difficulty in the church. "Individual members have suffered in their
spiritual life because of this. However, the effects of the controversy
were finally overcome within the Mennonite Brethren Church through
brotherly, loving admonition and public discussion” and, in the end,
through the decision prohibiting any of the brethren anywhere from
taking part in the controversy that was causing such deep turmoil in the
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
491
entire Mennonite community in the Molotschna. But the issue was
committed to the hands of our sovereign Lord on the part of our church,
and the difficulty within the Mennonite Brethren Church was overcome.
(About 1890 the crisis had passed throughout the Molotschna area.)
3. As we have seen, it was during this period that the question of §221
the relationship of the Mennonite Brethren to the Baptists was raised.
“This was occasioned by the beloved Baptist preacher, Br. August
Liebig, for a time an itinerant minister, and actually the leading minister
in Einlage, who had proved a great blessing by helping our churches in
may ways.” “He especially helped us to conduct our deliberations in an
orderly manner.” There were serious negotiations, especially at the
annual general conference in May, 1876, i
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…