← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 483 (not an original page number)
Unit 483 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
reports follow on the churches of Don-Mariopol and
Friedensfeld-Sagradovka, which became independent before January 6,
1885. Thus we note:
1) The affiliated group of Puchtin, presently reckoned as Gniden-
Blumenfeld, in the Alexandrov District of the Province of Ekaterinoslav,
formed by several land-owning families from the Molotschna Colony. We
know nothing of this group and its origin, other than that it is often
mentioned in the reports of itinerant preachers who visited the Mariopol
Plan and stayed with these members and conducted meetings.
2) The affiliate in the Crimea was established by Br. Andreas Voth
§229
500
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
(cf. document of organization and the voters’ list in the election of
preachers, 1860) and some other members sometime after the 60s. We
refer to the further report on the M.B. Chinch in Spat in the Crimea
which follows.
3) The affiliate of Herzenberg, now Alexandrovka, in the vicinity of
the district capital and railway station of Pavlograd in the Province of
Ekaterinoslav, was established around 1880. Among others, the founders
included the influential, active Br. Jakob Dirksen of Muensterberg, a
minis ter and for lengthy periods an outstanding itinerant preacher in
the Molotschna Church and the entire Mennonite Brethren conference,
and Johann Kliewer, a deacon by God’s grace, a pious and earnest
Christian and an active member in the intimate church fellowship as well
as the conference, and a model in his secular vocation (first as the owner
of a flourishing wagon factory and then as a farmer).
§230 14. Until January 6, 1886, the twenty -fifth anniversary of the
Molotschna M.B. Church, 1074 entries are listed in their baptismal
records (not counting most of the entries at the Don, with Mariopol,
those since 1864 at the Kuban, and for some time in Friedensfeld and
Sagradovka). Counted by half -decades, those received into membership
were as follows: 1860-1864: 260; 1865-1869: 127; 1870-1874: 178;
1875-1879: 190; 1880-1884: 319. We see that here, as in the Einlage
Church, the first and the last five years of the first quarter century
produced the greatest growth. The following year, 1885, the anniversary
year, produced the greatest number of new members in any one year: 171.
The years 1860/61 (baptism became a matter of the church only in 1861)
recorded 107. The lowest numbers were recorded in the years 1869
and 1870: with 15 and 14 respectively. The weakest of the half-decades
was the second: 1865-1869. The membership of the Molotschna
Mennonite Brethren Church, in the narrower sense of the two areas:
Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld, after the many small resettlements and the
larger emigration to America, was around 400; including the small
affiliated groups of Puchtin, Crimea and Herzenberg, it was around 500
of the total of ca. 1800 members of the entire M.B. conference. After the
emigration to America, there were about 200 members left at the
Mo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…