← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 484 (not an original page number)
Unit 484 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
lotschna.
C. The Kuban M.B. Church from 1873 to 1885
§231 1. We interrupted our narrative of this church in the year 1873, atthat
point when Elder Heinrich Huebert settled there permanently and the re-
verberations of fanaticism of the period before 1866 had been overcome.
Because of Elder Huebert’s f ailing health, Brother Daniel Fast was elected
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
501
elder. On May 5, 1877, he was ordained by Huebert and inducted into the
office of elder.
2. a) The death of Johann Claassen. For many years Brother
Johann Claassen had been the authorized agent and representative of the
Mennonite Brethren Church. Since 1869 he had been Area Administrator.
In the early 70s he was decorated for distinguished service as colonizer
and administrator. 298 Following this period, Claassen ’s health began to
fail rapidly. Earlier, Claassen had moved from Ovetschka to the lower
Kuban Valley, and had lived in immediate proximity to the river, a very
unhealthy location. It was also isolated from the two neighboring
villages, which made the medical care of the brother very difficult. So his
faithful, intimate brother, Deacon Abram Peters of Ladekopp, now
already deceased, brought him to the village of Wohldemfuerst. Graciously
he, together with his dear (second wife), cared for him. Claassen died
in the Lord on December 27, 1876, at the age of 56. He was bora in
Prussia in Ohrlofferfelde, near Tiegenhof, and had immigrated as a child
with his widowed mother, Helen, nee Penner, from the Roten Bude. (She
was the second wife of David Claassen of Ohrlofferfelde.) Johann
Claassen remained steadfast in the faith of his loving Savior, whose
gracious fellowship he experienced intimately until the time of his death.
b) Our appraisal of Claassen’s significance, which emerges clearly
from his letters and other documents, can be seen in the following
letter. 299 “Sevastopol, January 11, 1901. My dear and esteemed brother
and father in Christ, Abram Peters! Peace and grace as a greeting for the
new century. May Jesus, the unchanging Jesus, and His free grace,
through which we all receive life and salvation, life and holiness, remain
great in your life, and may He become ever greater in the evening of your
life; may He carry you in the maternal arms of His love during the
remainder of your earthly pilgrimage, and may He prepare and protect
all of us for life in the Father’s house! I received your letter and have
sent it to the brothers Kroeker, the editors of the Kalender, with the
explanation that I know you as one of our oldest and most revered
members, and that I consider your objections with the highest regard. I
knew nothing about the article in the Kalender before it was published.
(Only now have I looked through the article in its entirety.) Kroeker is to
be blamed only to the extent of having thrown a shadow upon Claassen
without also making reference to positive aspects of the matter. One
cannot deny
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…