← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 496 (not an original page number)
Unit 496 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ed that we were often strengthened through the ministry of the
brethren from the Molotschna and Einlage. Reichenfeld, August 20,
1884, Eduard Woelk.”
N.B.! Nearly all of the members on the Don River Side were of
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
513
Lutheran and some of Catholic background. 310 This caused legal and
administrative difficulties, so that the church on the Don River Side was
not able to identify with the brotherhood of Mennonite persuasion. Even
the General Conference of the M.B. Church could not help in this matter.
In 1887, subsequent to events recorded here, the church on the Don River
Side joined the Baptist Union under the eldership of H. Lietke. It was
then known as the Bilachvesch Church in the Mariopol District. The
Kleinliebental Church in the Donskaia District also joined under W.
Bechthold’s eldership. This occurred on the basis of the law of 1879.
Unfortunately this union did not develop with the kind of objectivity and
cordiality that could and should have been present. Both the Menno-
nites, who did the releasing, and the Baptists, who did the receiving, did
not do their best to achieve impartial and general knowledge of the
situation, nor did they exercise the greatest mutual respect and brotherly
love. A regrettable estrangement developed in the relationship between
the two newly established Baptist churches and the General Conference
of the Mennonite Brethren churches. This, however, was gradually
replaced by a loving fellowship as sister churches. All those members in
the churches of the Don River and Mariopol areas that did not want to
become Baptists emigrated to America.
The baptismal register of the churches of the Don and Mariopol lists
five hundred and thirty-eight names up to the end of 1886. In 1885 the
church listed about three hundred members.
F. The Mennonite Brethren Church on the Volga :
“Hahnsau" and “ Popovka ”
This congregation or these congregations were mainly a result of the
visits of the brethren Benjamin Becker, Heinrich Bartel and Otto Forch-
hammer around the year 1860. We know very little about it with the excep-
tion of the fact that its early period of existence was very stormy. At the
annual convention in May, 1874, in Andreasfeld it was accepted as the M.B.
Church of "Hahnsau” (a Mennonite Colony in the Koeppental Volost,
District Novo-Useni, Province Samara) and “Popovka” (a Lutheran
colony). These congregations were represented by the brethren Eckert
(bom Mennonite), Hahnhart, Borchdorf, Gruen and Stehle. The brethren
Eckert and Hahnhart probably were the leaders. Brother Borchdorf was
appointed as itinerant minister with a salary of 300 rubles and a vehicle for
transportation. With special emphasis, they declared the Mennonite Con-
fession of Faith to be their own. The “sister kiss” was tabled by the Volga
delegates. These brothers under the leadership of Eckert and Hahnhart
have migrated almost entirely to America because (since they w
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…