← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 495 (not an original page number)
Unit 495 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
er this many fell prey to the false freedom movement (see
above XII: ‘Wuest,’ Kappes), but some feared the Lord had based their
faith on the Word of our Redeemer, Jesus Christ. In secret they edified
one another. To some it became clear that it was not right to partake of
communion with unbelievers. They did not know how to go about
withdrawing from the church, however. Many thought it was sin to
§236
512
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
secede from the congregation, and so they all remained in the church.”
c) “About 1866, Johann Fitz 309 and Schroeder experienced an
awakening. On occasion there was talk about baptism 309 on confession
of faith. These two brethren reached a decision and were baptized by the
brethren in the Molotschna. After this the brethren Preiss and Lietke
were also baptized on their confession of faith. Thus the church consisted
of several members, and those not baptized would have no fellowship
with them.
d) “After this there was a movement to the ‘Don River Side’
[territory of the Don Cossacks], and the brethren Preiss and Schroeder
met with the brethren Regehr and Bartel of the old Molotschna M.B.
Church. They were of one mind, edified one another and based their
fellowship on the Word of God. Those who were baptized on confession
of faith soon met with Br. Abraham Comelsen. The group became
unified in naming him their leader. [Cornelsen had authored and signed
the founding charter of the M.B. Church in the Molotschna on January
6, I860.]
e) “During this time many of the old Mennonite Church brethren ex-
perienced new life. Among these were the brethren Johann Foth, Karl
Foth and Berchthold. When they were baptized in keeping with their
newly found faith, it became the occasion for a new movement among the
Mennonite Church brethren and many others. Many said: This is no good;
it is the kingdom of anti-Christ, and statements of that sort. But they
searched the Scriptures more and more, received insight and were
baptized on the confession of faith. Then, in 1875, Br. Leppke came there
as an itinerant minister (cf. above #208, etc.). A number became believers
through his messages and were baptized. The number of those baptized
finally reached more than two hundred. And though there was mild
persecution from time to time, the Word of the Lord proved victorious.
f) “At that time emigration to America began. Brother Leppke and
a number of others also left. When, in 1883, Br. Comelsen and Br.
Johann Foth departed as well, Br. Eduard Woelk became the leader.
g) “The congregation on the Don River Side is scattered far and wide
since the villages and ‘estates’ are small. Around 1885 the brethren
Bechthold and Dombrowsky ministered in this area. The brethren Lietke
and Koslowsky ministered in the Mariopol area and in the Bilachvesch
Colony, each in his respective vicinity. The number of believers
[members] in all of these localities is about three hundred. It should be
mention
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…