← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 498 (not an original page number)
Unit 498 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
of Flemish and Frisian (although one hardly knows the term
anymore) between Mennonites from the Molotschna, Chortitza, Volga,
Ohrloff, Gnadenfeld and Lichtenau, although they are united into one
‘‘General Conference,” were always felt more or less. However, at times
more, at times less, knowledge, power, weakness, light and darkness could
be found in the various congregations of the M.B. Church,
d) The chairmanship of the annual meetings was held for an un-
interrupted period of at least five years by Br. August Liebig who was
invited for each of the conventions. 4) The income was quite substantial
for the membership at that time: in 1874 with a membership of 800-900
an income of 2778 rubles, with expenses of 2225 rubles for the itinerant
ministry.
B. In learning to know the character of the itinerant ministers and
their activity, the nature of the spiritual life of the congregations in their
power and weakness, their congenial and antipathetic characteristics,
their diaries and reports can assist us. We have referred to the first "diary”
by Christian Schmidt and Jakob Jantz in #196. Some parts of the
reports of A. Unger and Christian Schmidt of 1875 and 1876 have also
already been quoted. We cite writings of:
1. Brother Jakob Dirksen 312 of Muensterberg (Herzenberg) who for
years together with Christian Schmidt represented the most intelligent
and the most eloquent of his ministerial associates. We have to empha-
size that, almost without exception, the itinerant ministers in their
written reports underestimate their personal effectiveness, their pene-
trating eloquence in their sermons and their general activity. They
were not men of the pen, and the Mennonite fears every exaggeration
and every diffuseness of the written word. This fact is applicable
to the vast majority of the reports, accounts, recollections, etc.
of Mennonite Brethren. The Mennonite is the taciturn, reserved
“Boer” with the exception of the fact that he does not fire guns or
cannons; Boer and Mennonite also have the same ancestry, pre-
dominantly Dutch.
a) Brother Dirksen reported on the first and second quarter of the
conference year of 1876-77:
“That was, indeed, your essence
Since days of yore
That you selected the quintessence
Of the weak, the frail, the poor;
That your work you have completed
With broken staff or rod ;
With flighted vine defeated
The foe— upon him trod.”
516
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
“If the truth of this saying were not confirmed many times over
even in our own days, and the Word of God would not point frequently to
the fact that it is not we who speak and act, but that God would like to work
through us, it would not be possible for me to accept an assignment such
as the Conference has given to me. But because it is this way, especially
also in our community, experience has corroborated the words of Paul in
I Cor. 1:21, so I too have dared, even though not without inner conflict,
in Go
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…