← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 521 (not an original page number)
Unit 521 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
years (at least twenty-five) in the
Kuban region, where he was an enthusiastic citizen. He sought
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
539
constantly to persuade “Brethren” to move to this colony. Un-
fortunately most of his efforts were in vain. (It is strange that following
the initial toil, stress, and disappointments, the M.B. Church never
manifested a warm interest in, or a real understanding of this child and
monument of the movement!) In his early years Schmidt was tirelessly
engaged at his workbench (he was initially a woodworker by trade) but
later increasingly engaged as a passionate gardener. It was “fist and
hump-back” (according to the Russian idiom) in his daily occupation, 332
heart and head in his searching of the Word of God, bosom and tongue in
his preaching and apologetics (defense of the doctrine) in private
conversation. Always and everywhere, all of Schmidt was involved. It is
to be noted that people in general, including children and young people
insofar as they were inclined toward piety, became and remained his
friends. To be sure, there was no lack of criticism, both justified and
otherwise, from both brethren and opponents. The “overjoyous” faction
disliked him as much as they disliked Jakob Reimer, and ex-
communicated him just as they did Reimer. The “Friends of Jerusalem”
were his staunch opponents, as he was theirs. Nor did the author belong
to those who particularly liked his methods or completely shared his
views on matters of faith and life. And yet who could doubt his honesty
and thoroughness as a Christian and as a citizen, and who could deny
him love and honor? He was born in Konstantinograd in 1833 (cf. section
197), received his schooling in part under the direction of Pastor
Landesen in Kharkov (see section 75, Reimer and Dobbert), where he
experienced deeply spiritual influences. In 1853, under the preaching of
Pastor Wuest in Neu-Hoffnung, he came to a full understanding and
assurance of the forgiveness of sin. He was baptized by Heinrich
Huebert in August, 1861. Together with Jakob Jantz, in August of 1865,
he was called to the teaching ministry, and in 1875, again together with
Jantz, he was ordained as associate-elder in Friedensfeld (#255). His
work as itinerant minister has been alluded to repeatedly above. The
sowing he did during his life is inseparably bound up with the work and
essence of the M.B. Church. To a not insignificant degree it received its
unique character through him. May his memory be guarded lovingly,
together with that of his co-workers who have already died or who will
soon do so! The dross burns; the gold remains. Brother Abraham Peters
died during this period as well, as did the aged deacon, Brother Johann
Fischer.
Among the elderly sisters and mothers of the M.B. Church who died
during this period were the widow of Johann Friesen of Gnadenheim;
Mrs. Peter Berg; the widow of Jakob Epp of Blumenort; the mother of
Mrs. Maria Huebert (wife
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…