← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 522 (not an original page number)
Unit 522 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
of Elder Huebert), who herself died about five
years after her husband; the widow of Simon Harms, daughter of Elder
Huebert; Mrs. Krause, nee Dyck, of Sparrau; the first wife of Jakob
540
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§246
Giesbrecht; and others. Brother and Sister Peter Dyck of Pordenau, at
one time very active in this church, migrated to America (about 1890)
and are now living in California.
2. Since the Kuban settlement is particularly and officially a colony
of the M.B. Church, we include here more detail about its civil, economic,
and social character at the present time (about 1904). Compare #280, 206,
and 231-234.
a) The population of both villages, Velikokniashesk and Alexand-
rodar (formerly Wohldemfuerst and Alexanderfeld), or the Volost of
Velikokniashesk, totaled more than 2,000 persons in 1904. Of these about
1,500 were of Mennonite extraction and legal status. Of the latter some
1,000 persons were registered in the volost. Over 200 of those so
registered, and over 550 of the entire church population (‘‘Church
registry entries”), belonged to the M.B. Church. Some 50 of the
Mennonite population were Adventists, and about 100 persons of
Mennonite extraction belonged to the "Templers.” 333 Thus the larger
portion of the Mennonite population belonged to the Mennonite Church;
Baptists (i.e. “Brethren” of non-Mennonite extraction and legal status)
numbered about sixty. Approximately 400-500 persons belonged to the
Orthodox, Catholic, and Lutheran churches and to the Jewish confession.
The majority of the non-Mennonites were Orthodox Christians. As to the
landowners and the enfranchised members of the volost community, it
was the “brethren” who constituted the determinative majority and as a
rule held most of the civic offices.
b) The land possessions of the volost community consist of
sixty-seven full farms (in Alexandrodar such a farm comprises
sixty-one dessiatines; in Velikokniashesk, sixty -five) 334 and eight small
farms of ten dessiatines each (Velikokniashesk— five; Alexandrodar—
three). Classified by vocation and ownership, ten landless day -laborers,
150 landless trandesmen and industrial tradesworkers, eight small-farm
operators, twenty-two half -farm operators, and fifty-seven full-farm
operators lived in the villages in 1904. Of the latter some owned more
than one farm. Also, there were fifteen landowners who held property
outside the colony (estate owners). 335 Only a few persons (single adults,
family heads, or widows) received regular assistance for the poor from
the churches or the volost. Large industry and business: there were two
factories producing farm machinery, two steam-operated mills, three
watermills, one “Dutch” windmill, one ordinary windmill, one cheese
factory, three general stores, four market gardens, one large communal
vineyard, several prosperous apiaries, one apothecary warehouse, one
drug store, and one bookstore. Co-operative enterprises: One co
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…