Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 538 (not an original page number)

Unit 538 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
on to the Red Cross for war needs. It is keen in the pastoral care of members and in church discipline. This young and not very large M.B. Church, at whose head stands one of our formerly prominent elementary school teachers (at present, January, 1910, Br. David Duerksen is unfortunately seriously ill 347 ), has placed a large percentage of young men in the ranks of our intellectual and spiritual workers. Besides the two Kroeker brethren, and the above- mentioned missionaries, Heinrich and Cornelius Unruh, there must be mentioned here the brothers of the latter, Abraham Unruh (graduate of the Ohrloff Secondary School and the Halbstadt teacher-training course), teacher and preacher, formerly of the Crimea, now in Barvenkovo (see above, Petrovka-Naumenko), and Benjamin Unruh (graduate of the Ohrloff Secondary School, the Halbstadt teacher -training course, and the evangelical seminary in Basel, Lie. th. from the University of Basel, at present instructor of religion and the German language in the Mennonite Business School in Halbstadt). A number of other young men, and women, are studying in a variety of institutions. 3. Questions which have troubled and still plague the church, are the question of marriage and the question which at present is disturbing all M.B. Churches, namely that of “open co mmuni on.” The first of these The M.B. Church 1885-1910 557 has been finally settled in the church of Einlage and the Molotschna in the spirit of sections 212 and 241, 6. The second is, as elsewhere in the M.B. Church, still pending. The stance of the church in the Crimea is mildly conservative, as is also that of its elder. The question regarding the Baptists (#201, 211, etc.) was a very sensitive one here, because a small Baptist Church in the Crimea could not achieve a regulated leadership for a long time. Now, praise God, the little “half sister” (the designation is not used in the same sense as the great Elder and Chief Shepherd uses it!) is independently organized, the church is led by its own ordained elder, Br. Eisemann, who has been confirmed by the government. Now this church need no longer trouble the sister M.B. Church for services of love, such as baptism, solemnization of marriages, etc. The relationship promises to become more a pleasant one because of the present equality. The perfect law of brotherly love, according to Rom. 12:10, Gal. 3:28, and I Pet. 1:22, has not remained untarnished here, and the judging Shepherd will have to censure here as well. It is remarkable that the excellent report above does not refer to this group of “believing and baptized children of God” with as much as one single word! 4. This group does not have branch groups in the sense of affiliates. All groups together form one compact church with two centers where major meetings are held. These centers are Schoental, which has a building with a seating capacity of 600 (and could be increased considerably with the

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…