← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 54 (not an original page number)
Unit 54 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
The Setting
a) The Dutch Anabaptists, who emigrated during the period of
persecution in the Netherlands before that country’s liberation from the
Spanish-Jesuit yoke, provided the base and greatest number for the
Mennonite congregations in Prussia, our (the Russian Mennonite)
forefathers.
b) Earlier, Prussia was Slavic-Polish territory. Shortly after 1200,
the celibate knights of the Teutonic Order, which had arisen in Palestine
during the Crusades, came to Prussia in order to “convert” by means of
fire and sword the Slavic Prussians (Prussen, Borussen), Lithuanians,
Kashubians, etc., to Roman Catholicism and the German culture. In the
course of time, these knights became vassals of the Polish kings. In 1525
Albrecht, the master of the order, together with the majority of his
knights, became Protestant, married, and was given the Order’s territory
of East Prussia, with the title of duke, which he held as a fief of the king
of Poland. When his son died childless, East Prussia came into the hands
of the Margraves of Hohenzollem and the Electors of Brandenburg, but
not to Germany, for, like West Prussia, it became a part of Germany
only in the 19th century (1866 into the North German Union, and 1871
into the Empire). In 1660 the princes of Brandenburg became sovereign
rulers in Prussia, independent of Poland; and in 1701 the Elector of
Brandenburg took on the title of “King in Prussia,” with Koenigsberg as
the coronation city, but as Elector of Brandenburg he remained a vassal
of the Hapsburg Emperor. Gradually, the collective lands controlled by
the Hohenzollem came to be called the “Kingdom of Prussia,” which,
through the acquisition of Polish and German territories, became ever
larger and more powerful until it became the most prominent part of the
new German Empire, whose emperor is always the current King of
Prussia.
c) Our Mennonite forebears always had to deal with this originally
Slavic-Polish Prussia, the present Prussian provinces: East Prussia,
with the cities and administrative center of Koenigsberg and Gumbinnen,
and West Prussia, with its administrative centers of Danzig and
Marienwerder and the cities: Danzig, Marienwerder, Elbing, Marien-
burg, Schwetz, Graudenz, Thom, and the borough Tiegenhoff (“T’hoff”).
All these names play a significant role in the history of our forefathers and
in the stories of our immigrant forebears. The actual scene of our
Prussian history, however, was West Prussia and the region of the free
city of Danzig; the first came to Prussia from Poland in 1772, the second
in 1793. Only the small group of those of our immigrant forefathers who
§12
41
42
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
came from Gnadenfeld (and a few from Franzthal. etc.) actually came
from the German Empire: these lived in Brandenburg (in Brenkenhofs-
walde and Franzthal, etc.) to which they had moved in 1760 from the
region around Schwetz in West Prussia.
2. The Origin
a) According to Re
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…