← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 53 (not an original page number)
Unit 53 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
om the Calwer Bibel Lexikon, II, p. 168.
“Even though Menno had many unique dogmatic-speculative
opinions 15 (with regard to Christology), the central thrust of his efforts
was the creation of a pure church separated from the world, and
consequently a renewal of the individual through a conversion which he
40
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
saw essentially as a moral cleansing under the influence of and in
obedience to God’s Word. Baptism, according to Menno, has absolutely
no mystical [mysteriously operative] significance, but is rather a
symbolic [allegorical] expression of the already completed conversion,
and consequently only appropriate for adults. These fundamental
viewpoints, together with the rejection of the oath, are still operative
today in the congregations which claim descent from Menno. In contrast,
as a consequence of many disagreements and schisms, the strictness of
the old church discipline, the prohibition against military service, and
the assumption of political offices have gradually fallen into abeyance,
and, since the second half of the 17th century (and later consistently
more so), even with regard to dogmatic issues— at least in the
Netherlands— the liberal wing, which would recognize no binding
confession of faith but wanted simply to adhere to the Bible (‘Galenists’
after their leader Dr. Galenus Abrahams [De Haan] or ‘Lambites’),
gained the upper hand over the old orthodox ‘Apostoolites’ (after then-
leader Dr. Apostool) or ‘Sunites.’ In order to avoid any indication of
subservience to man, this more liberal element with regard to matters of
faith and discipline even dropped the name ‘Mennonite’ and called
themselves Taufgesinnte. These have gradually absorbed the entire
Mennonite community in the Netherlands and today constitute an
important church membership, intellectually alive and scholarly,
constitutionally independent, who, in matters of faith, encompass great
extremes from a simple biblical faith to the broadest radicalism. . . .
Thus, while the Mennonite name has, strangely enough, died out in the
old homeland, it lives on, together with more of the old simple, earnest
and strict spirit of faith of Menno— albeit without fanaticism and
aggressive [or combative] essence— in the few congregations in
Switzerland 16 (where a schism also took place in the 17th century over
issues pertaining to greater or lesser severity in matters of discipline and
life style— the adherents of Jakob Amman, 17 who regarded the use of
buttons instead of hooks and eyes and a shaven face as conceit and sin,
were called ‘Haeftler’ or ‘Baertler’), in Germany (congregations in
Alsace, Baden, the Palatinate, Wuerttemberg, Rhineland, Friesland,
Hamburg, Friedrichstadt, and Lithuania), in France and Russia
(immigrated Germans). The most prosperous and numerous develop-
ment of the Mennonites has taken place in North America (200,000
members).”
V.
THE MENNONITE CONGREGATIONS IN PRUSSIA
1.
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…