Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 53 (not an original page number)

Unit 53 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
om the Calwer Bibel Lexikon, II, p. 168. “Even though Menno had many unique dogmatic-speculative opinions 15 (with regard to Christology), the central thrust of his efforts was the creation of a pure church separated from the world, and consequently a renewal of the individual through a conversion which he 40 DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS saw essentially as a moral cleansing under the influence of and in obedience to God’s Word. Baptism, according to Menno, has absolutely no mystical [mysteriously operative] significance, but is rather a symbolic [allegorical] expression of the already completed conversion, and consequently only appropriate for adults. These fundamental viewpoints, together with the rejection of the oath, are still operative today in the congregations which claim descent from Menno. In contrast, as a consequence of many disagreements and schisms, the strictness of the old church discipline, the prohibition against military service, and the assumption of political offices have gradually fallen into abeyance, and, since the second half of the 17th century (and later consistently more so), even with regard to dogmatic issues— at least in the Netherlands— the liberal wing, which would recognize no binding confession of faith but wanted simply to adhere to the Bible (‘Galenists’ after their leader Dr. Galenus Abrahams [De Haan] or ‘Lambites’), gained the upper hand over the old orthodox ‘Apostoolites’ (after then- leader Dr. Apostool) or ‘Sunites.’ In order to avoid any indication of subservience to man, this more liberal element with regard to matters of faith and discipline even dropped the name ‘Mennonite’ and called themselves Taufgesinnte. These have gradually absorbed the entire Mennonite community in the Netherlands and today constitute an important church membership, intellectually alive and scholarly, constitutionally independent, who, in matters of faith, encompass great extremes from a simple biblical faith to the broadest radicalism. . . . Thus, while the Mennonite name has, strangely enough, died out in the old homeland, it lives on, together with more of the old simple, earnest and strict spirit of faith of Menno— albeit without fanaticism and aggressive [or combative] essence— in the few congregations in Switzerland 16 (where a schism also took place in the 17th century over issues pertaining to greater or lesser severity in matters of discipline and life style— the adherents of Jakob Amman, 17 who regarded the use of buttons instead of hooks and eyes and a shaven face as conceit and sin, were called ‘Haeftler’ or ‘Baertler’), in Germany (congregations in Alsace, Baden, the Palatinate, Wuerttemberg, Rhineland, Friesland, Hamburg, Friedrichstadt, and Lithuania), in France and Russia (immigrated Germans). The most prosperous and numerous develop- ment of the Mennonites has taken place in North America (200,000 members).” V. THE MENNONITE CONGREGATIONS IN PRUSSIA 1.

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…