← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 551 (not an original page number)
Unit 551 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
amilies and a greater number from the Volga
(Koeppental parish) actually moved to Turkestan. In addition to the
Elder Abraham Peters, another prominent leader was Brother Johann
Regehr, Hamberg, from the Halbstadt Volost (presently an elder of the
Mennonite Church in Turkestan). Claas Epp disillusioned the majority of
the "exodus brethren” with his fantastic foolishness (he set hims elf as
second “son,” alongside Christ) and left with a small group of followers
to settle in the domain of the Khan of China. The others decided to settle
in the neighborhood of the river Syr-Daria, District Aulie Ata, about 200
versts from Tashkent. There they founded five villages under the special
favor and with the assistance and counsel of the then incumbent
Governor-general of Turkestan, von Kaufmann. He was able to secure for
them the concession that their young men could render their alternative
service (replacing military service) right on the settlement, in the midst
of their families. The service consisted of planting a specified number of
trees. Br. Jakob Janzen (earlier a minister in the Mennonite Church,
subsequently a founder of a special “Brethren" Church which practiced
baptism by immersion, which he finally led to merge with the Mennonite
Brethren Church) proved to be a skilled and useful liaison person
between the settlers and the authorities. In 1910 the settlement included
about 200 families, consisting of about 1000 persons. By now they had
been cured of their exaggerated “exodus-refuge idea.” After weathering
the f amiliar controversies, hurt feelings, demonstrations of godly and
ungodly zeal in different issues, revival and various church organizations
and dissolutions, they were finally organized as the Romanovka
Mennonite Church and the Nikolaipol Mennonite Brethren Church (the
respective names were derived from the villages in which the church
buildings were located). The M.B. Church membership is slightly smaller
in number than the Mennonite Church. The relationship between these
two sister churches is really cordial. Seldom has the furor Mennoniticus,
the Mennonite passion for sectarianism, permitted such a relationship.
In 1905, the leadership of the Nikolaipol M.B. Church in Turkestan
consisted of the following persons: Elder Heinrich Kroeker (minister
since 1885), ordained as elder by Elder Jakob Jantz, Friedensfeld. The
ministers: Jakob Janzen, since 1875, Jakob Mandtler, since 1875,
Johann Klassen, since 1899, Aron Dyck, since 1904, Franz Braun, since
1904. The deacons were: Jakob Wedel, since 1904. By the end of 1908,
church membership stood at 249 and the total including adherents stood
at over 501. In certain ecclesiastical, administrative matters, the
572
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Nikolaipol M.B. Church is distinctive, but it enjoys full spiritual
fellowship with the total M.B. Brotherhood. In response to frequent
requests, the brotherhood has sent visiting ministers as well a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…