← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 550 (not an original page number)
Unit 550 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
obsession. An early, enthusiastic participant and disciple of Epp
has written a detailed and very interesting account of the movement and
particularly about Epp. Now a sober critic and an honest and reasonable
Christian, he writes about these things in his book entitled Unser Auszug
Nach Mittelasien (Our Exodus to Central Asia) by Franz Bartsch,
teacher in Lysanderhoeh, Province of Samara (published by “Raduga,”
Halbstadt). The first leader in the movement in the Molotschna was
Abraham Peters (Fuerstenau-Friedensruh), a former public school
teacher, who in 1873 established his own church under the name ‘‘The
Brethren Church among the Mennonites” (referred to as the Abraham
Peters Church to distinguish it from the Hermann Peters Church). This
church drew a number of members from the Ohrloff-Neukirch Church and
other parishes. This church differed from the Mennonite Brethren
Church of 1860 in its freedom in the matter of baptism 349 and a
pronounced Kleine Gemeinde character in the positive sense which
expressed itself in strict church discipline in all life situations,
particularly in economic issues. However, preoccupation with petty
things was another characteristic. The “Abraham Peters Church” also
held, as did the Volga brethren, that in the imminent period of the
Anti-Christ, the only place of refuge for God’s children was in central
Asia (Jung-Stilling’s theory). It should be mentioned here that our
“Mennonite Wuest,” the late Minister Bernhard Harder, was for some
time a strong supporter of this view, in sharp contrast to his cousin, the
frequently mentioned Elder, Johann Harder. The generous provisions for
exemption in military matters, granted to the Mennonites by Alexander
II, seemed to them, as it did to those who emigrated to America, an
unevangelical association with “the Beast,” the state, hostile to God.
However, these people considered the West, including America, a type of
all that is opposed to God, so that in this respect they were separated
from Elder Isaak Peters and other emigrants. Br. Bernhard Harder was
satisfied with the concessions for exemption granted in 1874, and as a
result was condemned for this by both the "Americans” and also those
bound for Asia. The writings of the Bavarian Pastor Cloeter were widely
read by the "Exodus” or “Kingdom-believing” people. The pastor had
established an “exodus colony” by the name of Gnadenburg, in the
Terek District (this was a sort of a pre-refuge). However, with respect to
military service, the pastor held the view generally held in Protestant
circles, and he also held infant baptism in high regard. Our Mennonite
The M.B. Church 1885-1910
571
“exodus brethren” combined a rigorous Mennonitism with the old
German evangelical pietism, 350 and certain of Jung- Stilling’s views.
“Under the wings of the great eagle”— Russia, the fleeing “wise virgins”
were to be “kept secure from the great tribulation.” In 1880 several
dozen Molotschna f
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…