← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 555 (not an original page number)
Unit 555 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ontinuous casualties among the defenders
of Sevastopol could not take place without a great increase in the
number of our wounded. Add to that even the smallest number of normal
sicknesses among our people as well as the wounded prisoners and it
becomes clear that the number of those that required thorough medical
attention among the military forces concentrated in the Sevastopol area
was considerable. Consequently, in order to provide for the sick, it was
necessary to have medical equipment and furnished hospital quarters in
578
THE STATE
readiness, to say nothing of medical remedies, a compassionate nursing
service and an effective supervision. The city of Simferopol, situated
nearest to the center of the war, was filled with casualties in short order.
It was essential that they be moved further inland. And what did the
Mennonites from the District of Molotschna do now? They took full
responsibility for the care and provision of five thousand wounded and
sick (soldiers) from Simferopol, transported them to their colonies, and
offered them excellent accommodations, care, and nurture as prescribed
by the doctor. Their wives and daughters took on the sacred duty of
sisters of mercy. They themselves dressed up the wounds, they tore up
their own laundry for cotton batting and bandages, took care of the sick
as they would their own children and brothers and all of this without
charge to the government for all those in their care. Only doctors and
medicine needed to be supplied. A number of persons were given lodging
in a tidy dwelling, and placed in soft beds. The sheets and pillowcases,
supplied by the host, were changed frequently and the wholesome
nourishing food as prescribed by the physician served in an atmosphere
of tender feminine care. One can imagine how much faster the wounded
must have recovered here than in the atmosphere of even the best of field
hospitals! How very many have the Mennonites saved for future battles
with this service. 3 In this m ann er they have returned a service to Mother
Russia for allowing them to settle on one of her best little corners and for
the prosperity which came to them because they knew how to acquire
and develop it from the native potential of the land.” (“Four Wars. Notes
during the Campaign” by P. Alabin, pp. 33, 34.)
“In view of these undeniable facts,” Mr. Kamensky continues,
“which characterize the conduct of the former colonists, the reader can
judge for himself how audacious and lacking in truth the contention is
that in our time of trial the colonists were passive and coldly indifferent
to our heartache— that they sought their own well-being and exploited
Russia’s time of stress for their own advantage.” (Velizyn, p. 134, op.cit.)
Mr. Kamensky further refers to the colonists' exemption from military
service at that time (p. 17) and emphasizes that they were all the more
useful in view of their unique position. We may add here— when Mr.
Velizyn an
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…