← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 56 (not an original page number)
Unit 56 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
In regard to the
Bohemian-Moravian Brethren, the remnant which was able to survive
their persecutions was gathered by Count Zinzendorf together
with other German believers and organized as the “Moravian Brethren”
(1725). This group is more familiarly known to us as the Zinzendorf or
Hermhuter brotherhood, their first location on the property of Count
Zinzendorf, Hermhut. It was the last ordained bishop of the old
brotherhood, the court preacher Jablonsky in Berlin (who had been
ordained bishop by the genial and pious pedagogue, the Unitas bishop
Amos Comenius), who transferred the bishopric to the new group by
consecrating David Ritschmann and Count Zinzendorf. Thus the
descendants of the old Waldensian and Moravian churches (churches
under the cross), have, as is apparent from the above and some other
things that will follow, maintained themselves to the present in three
ecclesiastical forms: in the evangelical Waldensian Church of northern
Italy, the Moravian Brethren and the Mennonite-Anabaptist brother-
hood. 22
c) According to Hartknoch, therefore, the first Anabaptists in
Prussia came from Silesia, while Reiswitz and Wadzeck believe that
these were Moravian Brethren. Such frequently recurring family names
among our Prussian-Russian Mennonite brotherhood as Sawatzky
(Sawadsky), Koslowsky, Rogalsky, Delesky, Selewsky, Retzlaf or
Ratzlaf (Rodoslaw?), perhaps even Spenst (Uspensky?) point to Slavic,
that is Czecho-Moravian and Polish elements. (The Bohe mian -Moravian
Brethren had also spread to many parts of Poland.)
d) The spiritual importance of the first known Anabaptists of
Prussia is apparent (according to Reiswitz and Wadzeck) from the
complaints of an important contemporary Lutheran minister of Koenigs-
berg in East Prussia, the bishop Polyander. In 1530 he complained that
the Elector Albrecht no longer regarded him as highly as previously and
that, “since he listened to the fanatics,” he attended his sermons only
infrequently. Thereupon the radicals were put to silence!
e) The true, later followers of Menno’s teachings (with whom the
Moravians in Prussia naturally intermingled), according to Reiswitz and
Wadzeck, first arrived in Prussia between 1540-49 from the Netherlands.
Aside from authentic documents, still preserved by the Prussian
congregations, the Dutch origin of the majority of the Prussian
Mennonites is proven by their Christian and family names, the family
and inheritance ties which still existed between the Prussian and Dutch
44
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
46
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
Mennonites around 1820, Dutch customs and life style, their knowledge
of the Dutch language, and Dutch religious books 23 [which our
immigrants brought along with them to Molotschna]. The main proof for
their Dutch origin, however, is that the Dutch language was originally
used in the church services, in Danzig as late as 1790 [the first Chortitza
Mennonites immigrated to Rus
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…