← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 57 (not an original page number)
Unit 57 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
sia from Danzig during the years
1787-1789]. One Prussian congregation [Montau in the Delta] still
possesses the original of a letter from Menno Simons to that
congregation in Prussia.
f) The great skill of the Dutch Mennonites to drain marsh lands by
means of dams and canals, made them invaluable to the Prussian
landlords. They turned the terrible moors of the Vistula and other
marshy regions, known to us as the “lowlands,” into veritable gardens.
They themselves became well-to-do and their landlords wealthy. The
latter protected them against severe persecutions, which threatened
them not infrequently, and later made it possible for them to acquire
precious documents of privileges, many of the originals of which are still
preserved in the archives of the Prussian congregations [Ohrlofferfelde].
g) The first teacher, elder or bishop of the West Prussian, especially
of the Danzig Mennonites, was Dirk Philips, Menno’s co-worker who
died in 1567.
h) High noblemen seem, even if seldom, to have joined their ranks.
Thus, according to Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Ciska von Ciechanoviec,
cupbearer in the Polish principality of Lithuania, joined them. Even the
Dutch church annals report that a certain knight Gerrit von den
Krommendam came over to them.
i) The present congregation of Montau in the Danzig Werder was
already in existence by 1570; its elder was Hans van Swinden. And in
1586 the delegates from five West and East Prussian congregations met
together in the first historically known conference of the West Prussian
Mennonites.
k) The persecutions in Austria, Bohemia and Moravia under the
Jesuit-influenced Emperor Rudolf II (d. 1612) brought the Prussian
congregations new members from the Slavic and South German regions.
Therefore we again find Slavic and South German elements entering
the main stream here.
l) The Anabaptists in East Prussia’s Koenigsberg and Prussian-
Lithuania’s Gumbinnen were much fewer in number even though,
according to the foregoing, they appeared there first. While they still
numbered 12,000 strong in West Prussia after the most important
emigration to Russia (and America), there were, according to Reiswitz
and Wadzeck, fewer than 1,000 in East Prussia in 1788, that is before the
Prussia
47
great migration. According to the evidence in our possession, the East
Prussia Mennonite artisans (weavers, etc.) and businessmen of Koenigs-
berg seem to have played an important role and won the good will of the
magistrates through their many-sided industrial pursuits, just as they
did in the cities of West Prussia, North Germany, and the Netherlands.
At the moment, however, the Koenigsberg congregation is close to dying
out (50 members in 1888). In contrast, the congregation in the
Prussian-Lithuanian administrative district of Gumbinnen is some 800
members strong, and seems to be related to our Molotschna and
Chortitza “Friesens”: the Rudnerweidner and Kronsweidner seem to be
relat
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…