← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 560 (not an original page number)
Unit 560 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ines of the last decade of the previous century and § 265
the first year of this century, equally great sums of money have been
given by all the Mennonite groups. Probably hundreds of thousands in
monies and goods were raised (of which, with regard to the year 1891,
Mr. Kamensky again bears persuasive and well-documented witness).
Both civil and religious communities as well as private groups and
persons worked diligently to alleviate this national distress by offering
money, goods and personal labors of love at the place of need.
3. a) During the unfortunate Japanese War, hundreds of thousands §266
of rubles and trainloads of products and warm clothing, linen and
bandages, partly prepared by thousands of busy women’s and girls'
hands, like cotton batting "charpie” during the Crimean war, were sent.
Every informed person knows what the Tauridan Mennonites (who
celebrated their 100th Anniversary in 1904) contributed towards the
preparation and maintenance of the Taurida District hospital, which
came into being because of the Crimean War and also what the Chortitza
Mennonites contributed towards a similar hospital in the Ekaterinoslav
District. Numerous letters of heartfelt gratitude testify for all time
concerning these deeds of kindness. We have cited only a few of the
many which were awarded in earlier as well as present times. Concerning
the imperial letters of thanks and recognition in the time of the Crimean
War and others, Mr. Kamensky, in refutation of the unjust accusations
which overzealous “patriots” have made, makes the following choice
observations: “When, substantiated with facts, it is proven that people
[the colonists and Mennonites], as a body, voluntarily and unanimously
sacrificed money, services, and products at any time, as the need arose,
for the benefit of their fatherland, [we could add, as Mr. Kamensky does
in another place ‘at the risk of health and life,’ e.g. Wilhelm Penner,
above]— and when it is proven that their conduct, as clearly witnessed
everywhere, attracted the recognition of the highest government and was
called a ‘heroic service’ by the Monarch— then, in the face of these
facts, they fortify themselves with such meaningless phrases as: ‘That
means nothing, the "kulaks” (land speculators in the villages) contributed
hundreds of rubles.’
b) We have already mentioned above that our Mennonite brothers
(as well as other German colonists) had sacrificed their very lives during
the Crimean War. The Japanese War presented further opportunities for
such sacrifice, and that on an absolutely voluntary basis. By the dozens
our young men, pretty well all of them from the ranks of those who had
586
THE STATE
§267
already served in the barracks, streamed to the front lines of the war
voluntarily to serve as medics with the view of caring for "their sick and
wounded brothers.” The churches, furthermore, donated many
thousands for equipping these medics, over and above
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…