← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 563 (not an original page number)
Unit 563 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
and repeated what was said earlier
concerning medical service.
6. The deputies were not permitted to confer with the Tsar
personally, but His Majesty allowed himself to be seen as if by chance
(during a leisurely drive) and honored them with a few words.
7. “. . . During our deputies’ stay in St. Petersburg they had found
a noble friend in the person of Pastor Hans, leader of the local Moravian
Brethren 11 congregation. This dear man took an active part in the
Mennonites’ concern and energetically helped along where he could. His
counsel and work were often of substantial help to them. . . .”
8. On February 26, 1873, a second deputation came to St.
Petersburg. It consisted of Elder Gerhard Dyck, Chortitza; Elder
Bernhard Peters, Margenau; Minister Heinrich Epp, Chortitza; Minister
Peter Goertz, Rudnerweide; and Mr. Heinrich Heese, Ekaterinoslav.
With Pastor Hans they found representatives from the Volga Menno-
nites and the Volynian Mennonites. A representative from the Hutterites
(Huttertal and Johannesruh near Melitopol), Joseph Hofer, was also
there. On March 6, they were led into the palace of the president of the
Imperial Council, Grand Duke Konstantin Nikolaievitch, who had
granted them an audience. “. . . His Imperial Highness was friendly,
condescending, and spoke German to our surprise. . . . He inquired about
our home country and after we had named the provinces from which we
came, he asked about each one’s village. He mentioned the fact that he
had visited our villages, whereupon we answered that we had pleasant
memories of that visit. Our concern, he continued, was well known to
him. Nevertheless he was going to receive our written petition and
peruse it later. The petition could not exempt us from compulsory
military duty; since, however, according to our faith we were not
permitted to carry weapons or take part in warfare, the government
would protect our conscience by assigning us to hospitals and work
camps instead of conscripting us into military service. We had been in
Russia for 70 or 80 years (he said), and enriched ourselves and had
enjoyed protection and favor: now we were to recognize our duty to do
Military Service and Emigration
589
something for the fatherland. When we replied that we felt deeply
grateful toward our eminent sovereign and beloved father of our nation,
and that we were prepared to prove such gratitude in a manner which
would not cause conflict for our consciences, he answered: ‘You are
supposed to be good Christians and as such it is your duty to help and
take care of a wounded soldier.’ When we tried to explain to him that
such service rendered under military command was different from
voluntary service, his countenance darkened somewhat. He discontinued,
took the petition from us, and dismissed us. The general appearance of
his highness was cordial, as was his bearing, but at the same time, firm
and determined. ...”
9. Under these circumstances, t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…