← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 564 (not an original page number)
Unit 564 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he Mennonites began to consider the
question of emigration. Nonetheless, another attempt to contact His
Imperial Majesty personally was made. In the fall of 1873 a third
deputation went to St. Petersburg: Elder Gerhard Dyck, Minister
Heinrich Epp and Heinrich Heese, all from the Chortitza congregations;
and Elder Bernhard Peters and Minister Peter Goertz from the
Molotschna. All attempts to reach the Tsar were in vain. With the
approval of Pastor Hans, the following petition to the monarch was
delivered to the Ministry of Crown Lands:
“Your Imperial Majesty!
Most gracious Tsar and Lord!
“With distressed hearts, yet full of confidence in a benevolent and
gracious reception of our most submissive plea, we respectfully approach
the steps of the throne of your Imperial Majesty.
“Our forefathers, called into the empire by the highest government, 1 2
furnished with an imperial charter, 13 which promised us complete
freedom of religion and conscience, and exemption from military and
civil service in perpetuity, found a haven here for themselves and their
descendants. Thanks to the protection of your Majesty and especially of
your predecessors, this has continued to the present.
“However, because of the intended introduction of universal military
service, which, as we understand, is to be enacted into law in the
immediate future, our hearts are deeply troubled that we should lose a
significant part of our confession of faith, the article concerning
non-resistance. We have presented our concerns not only to the imperial
commission appointed to implement the proposed law, but have also had
the honor at the beginning of this year to present them in the form of a
petition to His Imperial Highness Konstantin Nicholaievitsch, the
President of the Imperial Council.
“The issue is so serious and important for us— it constitutes a
590
THE STATE
§268
question of life and death for the continuation of our brotherhood— that
we feel compelled in our hearts to turn to the beloved father of our land,
our Tsar and lord. In complete submission and deepest respect, but in
childlike faith in the fatherly heart of your Majesty, who has an open ear
for the cry of pain of the lowliest children in the land, we lay before your
Imperial Majesty yourself our urgent plea for preservation of the
freedom of conscience which we have enjoyed until the present.
“In the name of our Savior Jesus Christ, who through our fathers has
given us the gospel of peace, who through His holy word commands us
to follow in His footsteps in love, in the way of suffering and endurance,
but not of war and that which is associated with it, we implore your
Majesty most graciously to free us from military obligation, and we shall
not cease to pray to our God and Lord to pour out the fullness of His
blessing on the dear head of His anointed, and on the illustrious imperial
household, and to protect our beloved fatherland from all war and
misfort
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…