← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 572 (not an original page number)
Unit 572 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the
author heard him express it in 1879) tossed him to and fro and finally
drove him to America, it was never held as a dogma. When he returned
to Russia for a visit in 1887 he indicated that things had taken a
different course in Russia than was earlier anticipated. God did not want
him in Russia any longer but used him much and long in America; this
has been the verdict of history.
598
THE STATE
§278
19. Documentary Supplements to “Military Service and Emigration.”
1) Two letters from Theodor Hans, the pastor of the Evangelical
(Moravian) Brethren congregation in St. Petersburg. (From Elder
Abram Goerz’s Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des ForsteicUenstes der
Mennoniten in Russland (A Contribution Concerning the History of the
Mennonites in the Forestry Service of Russia). Gross-Tokmak, H.
Lenzmann, 1907. With gracious permission from the publisher.
a) “To the elders and assemblies of the Mennonite communities in
the provinces of Taurida and Samara.
“You and your congregations have been placed before a very serious
decision due to the law concerning compulsory military duty. The
implications of this law you and your authoritative bodies have clearly
articulated. Your verbalized and written expressions against subordina-
tion to compulsory military service have been received by all the proper
authorities with the assurance that the government is deeply concerned
not to offend your conscience and to keep you and your communities in
this country.
“The enclosed conciliatory proposal from the Commission for
Compulsory Duty testifies to the Government’s serious efforts to come
to an understanding with you. The privileges of almost all other alien
colonists regarding exemption from military service are completely
suspended. However, because of the Commission’s proposal, every
Mennonite subject in the country is guaranteed a rather significant
exemption. They are excused from military participation at the front,
and from carrying weapons. (Instead) they are appointed for enlistment
in the hospital service, military workshop service, etc.
“The situation into which you have been placed is a far more
favorable one than that of your brethren in Germany, who are also
compelled to serve on the transportation and baggage vehicles in the
field. (There, unfortunately, they are also expected to carry arms even
though for defensive purposes only.) What the government is suggesting
for you in the present proposal is actually nothing which would make
you party to the evils of war. Medical corps services and maintenance of
military places of work (as long as these do not include weapons
factories, etc.) are sooner suited for alleviating the evils of war and for
that cause a Christian may extend his hand.
“It appears, however, questionable to you, dear brothers (regardless
of the nature of your compulsory service) , that you should relate in any
way whatsoever to a law which deals with military involvement an
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…