← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 573 (not an original page number)
Unit 573 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d
taking up of arms. You believe that (even though indirectly) you are still
thereby acknowledging war as justifiable. No more, actually, and no
Military Service and Emigration
599
more directly than when you pay for your personal duty with a
recruitment tax, which apparently does not cause you anxiety as is
evidenced by the conditions ('Privilegien') under which you settled in
Russia.
“One thing I wish not to overlook, however. It gives you a deep
concern to see your young men (exactly in those years which often are so
determinative for the rest of life) torn from your midst and submitted to
a totally strange influence in a very mixed environment. This concern I
share with you also on behalf of our own young men from Sarepta. In the
face of this, however, I must declare to you and myself:
1) That our trust in the fatherly protection of God will not deceive
us if it moves us to earnest prayer for our youth.
2) That a much greater blessing is gained precisely in the
disciplined cultivation of ethical-religious principles (which we are trying
to impress upon our children) than in external protection and in an
exclusion from every source of temptation.
3) That a momentary and temporary straying from the path of
godliness (painful as it may be) does not necessarily imply a continuous
apostasy from the spiritual heritage of our fathers.
4) That precisely the consciousness that our young men will need to
be exposed to alien influences must necessarily have a lasting and
sanctifying effect upon our training methods from earliest youth. I
cannot maintain that these considerations will be able to allay all our
fears but they will serve to quieten us by God’s grace (since the necessity
has arisen that our personal wishes must be sacrificed). I cannot help,
dear brothers, seriously to ask you to consider, that perhaps in the
gracious considerations which our government has allowed regarding
your point of view, there is to be recognized the hand of God for your
people. This hand may be pointing in the direction that you should not
automatically decline all government service assignments and that you
should not take advantage of the right to emigrate.
“I know that concerning the latter there is presently, in your circles,
a great deal of serious and urgent promotion but it is not being done in
the proper way— in the Spirit of God and to His gloiy. A number of
domestic as well as foreign newspapers are reporting more and more
concerning this agitation. Much of this agitation seems to me to be
tainted with carnal zeal and servitude of man. Such things are very
unbecoming in a religious community such as you are; they do not stand
you in good stead. Cherished brothers, oppose such dangerous
promotions (which taint your calling before God and mankind) in the
Spirit of Christ and in the discipline of solemn, sensible deliberation
600
THE STATE
before God. Don’t be taken in by the deception of such
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…