← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 578 (not an original page number)
Unit 578 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ot in opposition to the fundamental principles of our
faith, it would nevertheless disturb the family heads to bind themselves
irrevocably to a land and deprive their descendants, under pressing
circumstances, of the possibility of making a decision in line with the
confessional stance of the Mennonites. If, however, he and his
descendants were to retain the personal freedom to emigrate unmolested,
even at the expense of a part of their property, neither he could accuse
himself, nor could his children and their descendants direct accusations
against him for having remained in the country. Should the door to
emigration be irrevocably closed to him and his descendants after the
ten-year period of grace had come to an end, however, this would create
fears and concern and cause many to seek a land where they might find
greater legal freedoms, even though not a surer guarantee for their
non-resistance principles. 29
“4. In view of the conscription of our youths into the service we dare
to request two things, both of which are of the greatest importance to us:
1) that special lottery districts be established amongst us, 30 and 2) that
the same privileges pertain to our conditions of service that pertain in
other areas of service with regard to education and the voluntary 31
decision to enter the service.
“5. In our submission to His Most Exalted Excellency, von Totleben,
we expressed the request that our schools, which have till now been left
to our free supervision and immediate care by the most gracious
monarchs of the Russian Empire, retain this relationship and be granted
the rights of other schools in the empire which compare with them. At
the same time we obligate ourselves, out of a sense of duty to our dear
fatherland, to promote the language of the land with the greatest of
diligence. Naturally, we could not expect that this matter would be
immediately decided upon along with the law concerning our service
obligations. Nevertheless, we find ourselves at present forced, by the
prevailing conditions, to request that the question be resolved by a
Military Service and Emigration
605
legally binding decision. Because, as the result of serious consideration of
our future, we have more and more arrived at the conviction that this
point is of decisive importance and immeasurable significance to us,
indeed also with regard to our services vis-a-vis the state, we dare
herewith to request a favorable consideration of this our petition.”
3) A letter from church Elder Jakob Wiebe 32 of the Krimmer
Mennonite Church. (From the original):
Karassan, February 27, 1876
"To the venerable Elder Johann Wiebe, Schoenau near Samara.
Much beloved brother in Christ Jesus I
“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, the Father,
and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. Amen.
"... That our achievements have been recognized in military law is
to our greatest benefit. This, especially, give
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…