← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 577 (not an original page number)
Unit 577 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
unfortunately, still seriously agitating many of our people. Secondly, we
would thereby be granted an opportunity to demonstrate our zeal to be
of use to the state in our own way. In the case that we should be allowed
to set up such a program in which, according to our views, we could best
establish new forest plantations, we would most humbly make use of this
gracious opportunity and present such a program to the most high
government for its consideration and whatever application it would deem
appropriate.
"2. Since the abilities and inclinations of our youth with regard to
such service may differ, we most humbly request that our youths be
granted the opportunity at the lottery to choose the form of service in
accordance with their abilities and inclinations. It is to be assumed that
although most will prefer to serve in the forestry camps, many will also
choose to serve in the workshops. Having freedom of choice in this
matter would contribute significantly to alleviating the fears of the
congregations and cause many, who are already harboring emigration
plans, to remain in Russia.
“3. We are convinced that there is a suitable means through which
one might, with the greatest hope of success, now prevent the
continuation of emigration. However, we hardly dare to make pre-
sentations to the exalted government in this regard. But since it may be
in the government’s interest to learn to know more fully the
attitude of our church members and the motives behind the desire of
many to emigrate, and since we stand in the firm hope that the exalted
government will not regard that which is expressed here to be a demand
but rather a most humble request and presentation, we nevertheless dare
to do so, especially since both parties to the petition— both the restless
group, which believes that it must make its remaining in the fatherland
conditional upon the success of the petition, as well as the peaceful group
dedicated to Russia alone, which feels itself forced to do everything in its
power to restrain the stream of emigrants and to save the existing
604
THE STATE
settlements— trust in the paternal goodwill of the exalted government
which has never withdrawn this goodwill from her children because of
their most humble petitions. This means is the constantly available free
right to emigrate. The following are the reasons cited in favor of such a
policy: every Mennonite is more or less aware of the sacrifices,
difficulties, indeed even persecution under which our forefathers
defended their confession of faith and passed it on to us, and nearly
everyone knows what he must do in order to be able to pass this
confession of faith on to his children and their descendants. For our
fathers, too, left home, hearth and fatherland for the sake of then-
confession of faith, and only in Prussia, and then in Russia, our current
fatherland, did they find a haven. Even if the form of service we are
forced to accept is n
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…