← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 586 (not an original page number)
Unit 586 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
at
home and they could then assist the “minister” as deacons. In view of
the V < million annual expenditure, is this amount really such a
determining factor? It seems to us that the present method of spiritual
care is a great detriment to the holy cause.
c) And these young people’s conduct itself? It corresponds, more or
less, with their home families and congregations. There are thoroughly
“converted” young men who strive for holiness, the pride and joy of
their “Papa.” 38 Many are being converted (so the ministers report);
many of the young men are genuinely spiritual “seekers.” Quite a
number are decent, dear “fellows” (this [“Kerls”] is what they like to call
themselves); there are also some who are weak in manners and a few
mean, detestable individuals who bring shame upon their comrades and
their society and who are the source of grief and pain for their ministers
and home congregations. One Mennonite minister says: “Our young men
are much better than we may expect considering the conditions in our
home congregations and the unsatisfactory spiritual care which we are
providing.” We have personally witnessed unpleasant or regrettable
behavior on the part of our “Mennonite soldiers” on only very few
occasions. (We have occasion to observe many of them without their
recognizing us.) Many of them gave us much joy. In general we have
received a surprisingly favorable impression of them. In spite of the
plentiful, serious, hard and merciless criticism which has been expressed
we are convinced that the grace of God is in this matter and it can (shall
and must!) be elevated, honored, and sanctified. May the shepherds tend
their flock! God bless our “fellows!” May He bless the Tsar and the
people of Russia for such a gracious concession toward a very small,
adopted child of an alien race and faith! May He teach the congregations
(those in their membership who are spiritually alive and mature) above
Military Service and Emigration
613
all, to fulfill their duty towards their “hope for the future!” In spite of all
this we still believe that we Russian Mennonites are, in this way, to be a
“minister of peace.” In order to achieve that, however, we will have to
“climb upon a higher mountain” before God and mankind, Tsar and
fatherland (with much greater Christian and civic faithfulness, wisdom
and industry).
d) The 1,000 young men (approx.) are supported by a poll tax and a
property tax as the following record indicates: (Income tax is the subject
of lively and vehement debate both privately and officially. We consider
it to be the last word in wisdom and justice regarding this matter. What
are we, the “intelligentsia,” doing with our relatively high salaries:
secondary school teachers, deaf and mute school teachers, physicians,
lawyers, engineers, etc., etc.?). Below are the minutes of the “Decisions
of the general assembly of delegates of the entire Mennonite congrega-
tions (of Russia), May 5 and
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…