← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 587 (not an original page number)
Unit 587 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
6, 1910.”
“The authorized representative Mr. Claassen opens the session with
a brief address and conducts a roll call of delegates. In attendance
were— from Halbstadt: Abraham Isaak, Jakob Neufeld, Peter Friesen,
Peter Neufeld, David Klassen, Jakob Renpenning and Colony
Administrator Dietrich Dick; from Chortitza; Johann Thiessen,
Komelius Martens, Johann Reimer, Jakob Klassen, Peter Dick and
Colony Administrator Jakob Wiebe; from Gnadenfeld: Gerhard
Duerksen, Aron Rempel, Nikolai Esau, Peter Martens, Isaak Neufeld
and Colony Administrator Jakob Duerksen; from Melitopol: Johann
Neufeld and Wilhelm Klassen; from Nikolaipol: Franz Peters, Abraham
Braun; from Nikolaital: Peter Funk; from Neu-Chortitza: Jakob
Rempel; from Memrik: Komelius Unrau; from New-York: Jakob
Niebuhr; from Schoenfeld: Jakob Neufeld and Wilhelm Janzen; from
Ohrloff (Sagradovka): Peter Siemens and Heinrich Duerksen; from
Malyschin: Peter Wiens and Johann Bergmann; from Alexandertal:
David Ewert and Hermann Riesen; from Ufa: Gerhard Neufeld; from
Neu-Samara: Komelius Unger; from Crimea: Peter Wall and Heinrich
Dick; from the Caucasus: Alfred Lange and Gerhard Goerzen; from
Terek: Gerhard Schmidt; from Orenburg: Jakob Bergen; from Omsk:
Peter Petkau; from the city of Berdiansk: Wilhelm Rempel. Besides this,
the following members with voting rights were present: Commissioner
Jakob Dick and the members of the Council, Jakob Sudermann and
David Dick; a member of the auditing committee, Heinrich Schroeder
and eight ‘managers’ from the forestry camps (the latter without voting
rights).
"Point 1. Elected as secretaries by the assembly are: Hermann
Riesen (Alexandertal) and Peter Dick (Chortitza). 2. Upon examination
§285
614
THE STATE
of authorizations, it is found that the authorizations of the delegates
from Halbstadt and Schoenfeld do not conform with the format of a
uniform church decision as it was worked out in 1909. The assembly
declares that it cannot approve these authorizations. 3. Wilhelm Rempel,
the delegate from the city of Berdiansk is recognized as a delegate by the
assembly and the Memrik District is granted a second representative.
4. The authorized representative reports briefly concerning the economic
and financial situation as well as the moral-religious conditions at the
forestry camps and comments on our relationship to the government.
5. Mr. H. Schroeder reads the report of the auditing commission which
the assembly ratifies. The assembly offers its gratitude to the
commission. The report went as follows:
“The Auditing Commission has reviewed the accounts of the
authorized representative as well as the individual managers of the
forestry camps on April 5 and 6 of this year and we have found them
entirely in order. In addition, the expense estimates of the authorized
representative and of the managers for the year 1910 were thoroughly
inspected. We recommend them for ratification by the assembly of
dele
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…