← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 59 (not an original page number)
Unit 59 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
witz and Wadzeck and others)
Now that we have presented a brief summary of our pedigree as well
as our spiritual and blood ancestors (shame on him who forgets his
mother and is ashamed of his faithful nurse!), we want to attempt to
present a brief portrayal (derived from various sources) of the Prussian
Mennonites.
a) Under Polish Rule. The Mennonites of Prussia also suffered
persecutions, even though not bloody ones. They were especially
threatened with repeated expulsion. Thus it happened, among other
things at the provincial diet of Marienburg of 1646, that the lord of
Pomerellen angrily demanded that they be banished. He accused
especially the Danzig city fathers of being the cause of their toleration
and thus also the cause of the fact that God had visited them with the
flood and other events because of these heretics. In the lively debate that
followed, Jan Dzialinsky, an economist from Marienburg, and a few
other nobles came to the aid of the Mennonites, demonstrating that
these people brought the greatest benefits to the land in that they
improved old and built new dams against the floods of the Vistula and
Nogat rivers, and that one should rather be concerned that more of them
be brought into the country. "One can easily see where a lazy, drunken
farmer or where an industrious, sober Mennonite lives.” In order to
avoid being excommunicated by the Catholic Church, Dzialinsky and
those of a mind with him had to retract their remarks, but a majority
against the Mennonites was not achieved, especially because of the
negative attitude of the representatives from the major cities, and the
issue concerning the Mennonites was quietly passed over in the minutes
of the provincial diet. This one example shall stand for many. On
one occasion, during a particularly stormy argument over the “Men-
nonite question” in the royal Polish Senate, a high nobleman became
so agitated in his defense of the “Anabaptists” that he forced his way
to the very throne of the king. But even on this occasion the hostile
recommendations were not acted on, and the threats of expulsion were
Prussia
49
transformed into protective documents (“Privileges"). In 1764 the West
Prussian Mennonites sent their delegates, Cornelius Gerdsen and
Cornelius Willms, to the Polish king Stanislaus August Poniatovsky and
received from him a document, dated December 20, 1764, which
confirmed all their old religious and residential privileges, namely the
charters of privileges of 1650, 1660, 1694, 1699, 1732 and 1736. According
to Reiswitz and Wadzeck, the content of all of these documents conveyed
the message “that one must protect the Mennonites because they were a
useful people; the ancestors of the kings had brought them out of the
Netherlands in order to cultivate the marshlands.”
b) Under the German Hohenzollem. That is how it had been under
Polish rule. But it was to become more difficult for the Mennonites
during the reign of the
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…