← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 60 (not an original page number)
Unit 60 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
warlike Hohenzollem. Yet even here they knew
how to maintain their essential beliefs for some time. For here too it was
their benefit to the state, that is especially to the cities and large
landowners, which time and again, in spite of military considerations
and/or accusations of religious fanaticism, gained them their privileges.
Thus, as indicated above, Swiss Anabaptists were allowed to settle in
Prussian-Lithuania in 1711 under Frederick I. Strangely enough, that
great warrier Frederick (II) the Great, was especially well-inclined
toward the Mennonites of East Prussia. As is well-known, like William I
of Orange, he was broadly and unbelievably tolerant for his time in
regard to religious matters and demonstrated an equally fatherly concern
for the cultural elevation of his territories. It was therefore not for
nothing that "Old Fritz” was so popular with our Russian Mennonite
immigrant fathers. Already during the first year (1740) of his reign he
commanded, “that those Mennonites, who want to settle in Koenigsberg
and other locations of East Prussia, should everywhere be accepted.” He
made especially sure that the Dutch Mennonites knew this. (Of these it
must be said in recognition, that they were always ready to come to the
aid of their persecuted brothers through the Dutch government, which
was favorably inclined toward them, and whose good offices were used to
petition the persecuting governments— Switzerland, the Palatinate— as
well as directly with money and counsel). It was during Frederick II’s
reign as well, in 1764, that the fathers of our Gnadenfelder— 32
families— found a welcome acceptance, with conspicuous privileges
unheard of till then, in the mark of Brandenburg, the very heart of the
Hohenzollem state, where they founded Brenkenhofswalde, etc. His
father, Frederick I, had been less favorably disposed toward them, for he
could not forgive them the fact that two Mennonite "tall fellows,” who
had been acquired for his favorite plaything, the “tall guard”— that is,
had been coerced— had to be freed in accordance with the Mennonite
privileges. Similar recruiting incidents occurred repeatedly; although
they were always nullified as illegal, they nevertheless caused much fear,
50
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
qualms of conscience, and often severe and bloody abuse. Toward the
end of the 18th century the question of military service was settled for all
of the Hohenzollem-Prussian territories by imposing a considerable
tribute on the Mennonites for the support of military academies. In order
to stop the spread of this military exemption, the government finally
forbade not only the acceptance of new members into the Mennonite
congregations as well as all immigration, but also ordered that
Mennonites could henceforth buy land only from other Mennonites and
that all children of mixed marriages be brought up in the confession of
the non-Mennonite partner^The government of the morally weak
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…