← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 606 (not an original page number)
Unit 606 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
1910, at
Preservation of Independence
637
Schoensee, District of Berdiansk, Taurida.” 18
(These subjects for deliberation were submitted to all churches with
the following accompanying letter) :
“P.P.
“Herewith there is presented to you one copy of ‘Requests, etc.’ and
one copy of the ‘Most Humble Submission’ which you are to present for
consideration to a regular brotherhood meeting of your church, so that
your delegates at the prospective conference in Schoensee on October 26,
27 and 28 can respond to these questions in the spirit of the
congregation. As an explanatory comment to 'Requests, etc.’ we add
that the Mennonites in the projected legislation concerning religious
bodies and communions are counted among ‘those churches not
recognized by law,’ although the legislation grants the free exercise of
their religion. We cannot be identified with the ‘not recognized churches,’
the free exercise of religion mentioned there has been our right until now,
and is indispensable for the future— hence our comment: ‘cannot apply
to Mennonites in a negative sense, etc.’ Paragraphs 6-12 deal with the
establishment of a new congregation, especially important for us in our
young settlements. A form of a ‘Certification of the Mother Church’ will
in all probability be presented to the Conference. All comments of the
congregation are to be made on the white margin. With greetings, H.
Unruh, H. Braun.”
I.
“The wishes of the Mennonite churches 19 in Russia with reference to
several points in the ‘Short Explanatory Notes’ relative to ‘the
projected legislation concerning Religious Church Bodies and Religious
Communions.’
"To Article 2, 1, of the Project and the annotation to this article. The
application of Article 2 cannot be employed against the Mennonites in a
negative sense since their doctrine is recognized by law: the gracious
most high statute. Tsar Paul I, of September 6, 1800 (copy enclosed), and
the Articles 1104 and 1105 of the regulations concerning the
‘ Ecclesiastical Affairs of Foreign Denominations.’ It would seem
strange, if the Mennonite doctrine of faith would be described as not
being recognized by imperial laws, when seven all-Russian monarchs,
beginning with Tsarina Catherine II and up to the present, until the
current blessed reign of the lord and Tsar, Nicholas II, have recognized
it. We plead, therefore, to grant unto us the right to practice the church
regulations, customs and rules of our Confession of Faith also in the
future without any interference by worldly authorities in the spiritual
affairs of our congregations.
638
MATTERS OF FAITH
“To 6-12. The presently-existing Mennonite ‘Church-Congrega-
tions’ 20 are sufficiently known and recognized (see discussion above).
New congregations to be established give notice of the fact of their
organization to the respective provincial authorities for registration.
Such notification is to be accompanied by: 1) a certificat
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…