← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 610 (not an original page number)
Unit 610 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
l as in
their church parishes.’ The law makes this supervision obligatory for all
‘spiritual teachers’ in active ministry. As a result of the peculiar
Mennonite church order, the training of ministers varies greatly. For this
reason, the spiritual teachers of all Mennonites impose upon themselves
restrictions in this regard— with the consent of their congregations— in
that they elect from their midst those colleagues for school supervision
who are regarded as the most competent, spiritually and pedagogically
(mostly former pedagogues). Every such election is brought to the
attention of the local school board.
“B. The Employment of Teachers of the Schools Supported by the
Mennonites. In a circular of September 13, 1891 (under Number 15884),
the Administrator of the Ministry for Public Education, Bythshkov,
prescribes, in the form of a temporary rule, ‘that the teachers of these
schools are chosen by the school inspector, and upon his recommendation
to the Director of Public Schools they are to be certified for service,
dismissed from the same, or to be transferred to another school.’ On the
basis of this regulation, misunderstandings have occurred and are
occurring at present in many congregations, who support their own
642
MATTERS OF FAITH
§296
schools, and their local school board. In agreement with the explanation
of the directing senate in its decision of June 15, 1883, under Number
4807, (and of October 8, 1903), the jurisdiction with regard to the
selection of candidates for teaching positions belongs to the owners of
the school. Therefore we petition, since all our congregations are the
founders, owners, and supporters of the schools, again to restore the
regulation as it existed prior to the mentioned temporary arrangement
with regard to the employment of teachers in our municipalities, villages,
estates, etc., according to which the school assembly or society has the
right to select teacher-candidates and to present them for certification.
“C. Worship Services in School Buildings. Ever since the Mennonites
have lived in Russia, they have conducted their worship services not only
in their churches, but also in school buildings. In the villages these are
built and supported exclusively at the expense of the village
communities. (On the landed estates at the expense of the landowners or
renters.) During school-time, they are used for the purpose of instruction,
and at other times— according to need— they serve as places of
congregational worship, as has also been the practice of Catholic and
other Protestant colonists.
‘‘At the present time, the conducting of worship services in school
buildings is prohibited by the police in many places. 25 Through such
prohibition the respective congregations are brought into a difficult
situation, since many of their members reside at some distance from
buildings of worship (in places from four to ten versts and more).
“We, therefore, request that
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…