← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 612 (not an original page number)
Unit 612 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ghts of
ownership, to make full use of all lands, fishing, brewing of beer and
vinegar, distillation of wine for their own use, as well as for sale within
areas designated to them.
"Fifth: We forbid outsiders to build inns and pubs, as well as such
merchants to sell wine and maintain taverns on the lands belonging to
the Mennonites, without their consent.
“Sixth: We affirm by Our Imperial word that none of the
Mennonites presently settled or those who will settle in the future, their
children, or their descendants, at no time whatever will be drafted and
enlisted into military or civil service without their personal desire.
“Seventh: We free all their villages and houses from any kind of
644
MATTERS OF FAITH
billeting and lodging, with the exception of those times when
detachments are on the move, billeting regulations should be observed.
In the same manner We free them from every kind of public works, on
the condition, however, that bridges, ferries and roads located on their
lands be kept in proper order and that, in accordance with general
regulations, they participate in the maintenance of mail service.
“Eight: We most graciously grant to all Mennonites and then-
descendants full freedom and authority to use and dispose of their own
possessions according to the discrete and best intentions of each
individual, excepting, however, the land granted to them by the
government. But if some, having paid all debts listed against them,
desire to leave Russia with all their belongings, they are liable to pay a
three-year tax on the capital gained in Russia, the amount to be set by
their own consciences and by that of the village authorities. The same
principle is bound to be applied to property of the deceased whose
relatives and descendants reside in other countries when the property
will have to be transferred to them according to hereditary rights
established among them. In such case, they may, at the discretion of
villages, elect trustees according to their rules over the estate of
underaged children remaining after death.
“Ninth: We affirm to them the ten-year privilege of tax exemption
granted earlier, extending it also to those who in future will settle in the
Province of Novorossisk; but since according to a survey, settlers are at
present in a difficult situation due to several years of poor crops and loss
of cattle; and, in addition to that, in the Chortitza area some families are
expected to resettle on other lands for reasons of overpopulation,
therefore, considering their poverty and lack of means of subsistence,
and having earlier graciously granted to those who remain at the places
of present settlements, a ten-year privilege, we extend the privilege for
five more years; and for those who will resettle, for ten years, but decree
that after the lapse of this time they pay fifteen kopeks per dessiatine
annually from the sixty-five dessiatines of land granted to each family;
freeing
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…