← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 616 (not an original page number)
Unit 616 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
. 29
During the current year, a group of members of the M.B. Church was
accused of unlawful, propagandists actions. A prominent provincial
official authorized to make arrests and take other measures, carried on
investigations. However, in spite of the most thorough and most
comprehensive treatment of the matter, he declared such actions to be
inopportune and did not carry them out. Yet this gentleman declared,
that a certain group of “Mennonite Brethren” were not Mennonites, but
Baptists (which was not substantiated, however, by higher authorities).
At this point, a concern emerged among some good but anxious
members, among a few evil-minded ones out of envy and malicious joy,
among others, and including some leaders of the Mennonite congrega-
tions, because of a basic conviction and in honest opposition as well as
650
MATTERS OF FAITH
§298
among several over-zealous “brethren.” Among them certain excitement
and contention surfaced, as well as in the Mennonite press. Much
that was embarrassing was unnecessarily said; we would gladly
consign this to the forgetfullness of society, and to the gathering
dust on the yellowing pages of the newspapers. Anyone interested
to discover the truth, objectively and calmly, for himself, should
read statutes in part “D” of our book, beginning with #70 (which
arouse our antipathy, and are so numerous as to be nauseating, but
which are necessary for objectivity). Another symptom causing anxiety
during the last summer was the sudden prohibition of “solemn baptisms
under an open sky” disclosed to the representative of the Rueckenau
M.B. Church, H.J. Braun, and to the elder of the “Molotschna
Evangelical Mennonite Brotherhood,” Heinrich Guenther. As a result of
a personal and written petition of the two leaders mentioned above
addressed to the governor of Taurida, and the latter’s cordial and
immediate presentation, the Department of Ecclesiastical Affairs of the
Ministry of the Interior completely rescinded the matter and informed
the two brethren (Braun and Guenther) via telegram that they were
released from their restriction, and that “the baptism of Mennonites
under an open sky” was permitted on the former basis. 30 These and
other things created a somewhat tense atmosphere and apprehensions for
the “General Conference.” Praise God— it all transpired publicly and
officially, in complete quiet and peace, in the best way as already
described. Obviously, there were undercurrents, but also a wholesome
counter-pressure in both camps. An educated “Old Colony” minister 31
writes to the author: “We in the Old Colony are somewhat slow, hence
we are not excited too quickly. Here, too, people have read with interest
(in the papers] about the outbursts on both sides, but have reduced them
to the proper measure of personal irritability, and therewith prevented a
too strong generalization .... And we . . . men of the Old Colony . . .
would have, I believe (in the event tha
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…