← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 617 (not an original page number)
Unit 617 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
t it had come to a head), tried to
subdue it. We did not seriously believe in this danger, since we believed
that we had matters in hand, i.e., to be able to ward off any offence.”
And— praise God! “It was peaceful and beautiful at the Conference,” an
influential “brother” wired us. God will bless the “peacemakers!”
b) And thus we, as “United Old-Evangelical, a so-called Mennonite
Brotherhood” (see #294, “Explanations,” A, paragraph 4) have come
before the highest government, as well as (indirectly) before the
legislative body of our fatherland, and, finally, before His Imperial
Majesty. This has been realized in that the Schoensee Conference has
sanctioned all steps taken by the authorized representatives, and all
resolutions of the various deliberative bodies (laid down in the above
Preservation of Independence
651
The Commission for Matters of Faith reappointed by the General Mennonite Conference
at Schoensee in October, 1910.
a) Abram Goetz, Elder of the
Mennonite Church, Ohrloff-
Neukirch.
b) H. J. Braun, Authorized min-
ister of the M.B. Church Ruecke-
□au.
c) D. H. Epp, Minister of the
Chortitza Mennonite Church in
Ekaterinoslav.
652
MATTERS OF FAITH
statutes) and submitted them as directives to the three newly-elected
plenipotentiaries (Goerz, Braun and Epp). (De jure any single con-
gregation, brotherhood-meeting or session could renounce the resolutions
of the Conference, and would then be left to its own fate.)
Among the approximately 16,000 Mennonite families, there are
probably not more than 1,000 who are not deeply rooted in the soil of
Russia, and for 121 years we all know "no king but the emperor” of
Russia. When the North American colonies had declared and
consolidated themselves as "The United States of North America,” and
the Mennonites were better off under the new state-structure than
before, a number of Mennonite families could not come to rest in their
heart and conscience. A small group went in search of “a country in
which the king of England was honored” and a massive emigration to
Canada took place where the king of England was honored. 32 When
Prince Galizyn visited the Russian Mennonites in Manitoba, Canada,
around 1890, they asked him officially in their churches (in a naive and
moving manner) “to say to the Tsar of Russia” that they were enjoying
their life very much under Queen Victoria, but that their heart had not at
all forgotten the love and gratitude toward Russia and its imperial
family. Only for conscience’ sake (so they understood it— not we who
remained in Russia) had they been compelled to leave the land so
unforgettable for them; but they would never forget their love and
gratitude toward the tsar and the country. We present-day Mennonites
of Russia “would like to remain only in that country where the Russian
tsar is honored!” If His Imperial Majesty considers it timely and willed
by God to present all laws for consideration to “
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…