← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 619 (not an original page number)
Unit 619 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
of a “Most Humble
Submision” 34 to the Minister of the Interior concerning our church
registration records. The aforementioned submission was accepted by the
assembly with the following changes or additions:
a) Section 2, page 3, the German translation shall not read
“Mennonite church congregations,” but “Mennonite congregations.”
Note re: Section 2, page 3, point 1: “A certification of their
congregation.” A commission composed of the men: Abraham Goerz,
David Epp, Heinrich Dirks, Wilhelm Neufeld, and Peter Penner is given
the assignment to prepare a form of certification, which is to be issued
by mother-congregations when new congregations are established.
§299
654
MATTERS OF FAITH
b) Point 2, page 5, is to be formulated thus: ‘‘Our spiritual workers:
church-elders and ministers (‘spiritual teachers’— Article 1105) are from
the respective church parishes,” etc.
c) Point 2, page 5, should read: ‘‘children of church members, who
have been entered into the birth-register of the congregations, are
considered as ‘adherents of the church.’ They stand under spiritual
nurture and instruction (catechumen— children’s worship service) and
attain to full membership rights only through admission according to the
established order as laid down in point one.”
d) To point 3A, page 11, 35 is to be added: “To these individuals is
also assigned the supervision of the instruction in German, since the
German language, as the mother-tongue of Mennonite students,
constitutes an essential aid in imparting of religious instruction.”
Second Day (October 27)
Forenoon: Opening with song and prayer by the chairman, Mr.
Heinrich Unruh, Muntau.
The form of certification for joining a prospective new congregation,
prepared by the Commission, is approved by the assembly and added to
the documents [see end of these minutes].
The presentation of the “Most Humble Submission” as accepted in
its changed form on the second day of the conference and also the
undertaking of all steps connected therewith, are assigned to a
commission composed of the following members : Elder Abraham Goerz,
Ohrloff, Minister David Epp, Ekaterinoslav, and Minister Heinrich
Braun, Neu-Halbstadt.
The body of delegates in matters of forestry camps shall be asked to
assume the costs connected therewith.
2. Second Point for Deliberation: The Mental Hospital “Bethania.”
Mr. Jakob Sudermann, Apanlee, presents a report about the
development of the work in matters related to the institution "Bethania”
during the course of the last conference year:
a) Concerning the establishment of two bursaries in Bethania
through Mr. Wilhelm Schroeder (Jerlitzkaia) in the name of W.M.
Schroeder, and for which Mr. Schroeder has made the sum of 40,000
rubles available to the administration.
Note: The conference expresses its gratitude to Mr. Schroeder for
his donation by rising.
b) Statement of income and expenditures up to October 25, 1910:
Total receipt
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…