← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 620 (not an original page number)
Unit 620 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
s amounted to 93,510.63 rubles
Preservation of Independence
655
Expenditures 51,382.87 rubles
In the treasury to date: 42,127.76 rubles
Note: The legacy established by Mr. Schroeder is not included in
this statement.
c) Concerning the appointment of a physician, of a supervisor, etc.
Mr. Sudermann points out the special difficulties related to the
procurement of a suitable staff. The reporter pleads to stimulate greater
interest for this matter in the congregations.
Note: For the time being, no definite decision is being made with
regard to the level of payment for the care of the sick. Until further
arrangements can be made, expenses are to be covered by voluntary
contributions.
3. Third Point for Deliberation: The “Maria Deaf and Mute
School” at Tiege. Reporter Mr. Jakob Schroeder, Ohrloff. He emphasizes
the undisturbed and successful nature of the work. The original capital of
the institution amounts to 18,000 rubles; the reserves to 10,000 rubles.
The institution still depends upon voluntary support. The assembly is
challenged, therefore, to continue to remember the Deaf and Mute
School.
4. Fourth Point for Deliberation: Concerning our Forestry Camps.
The reporter is Mr. David Johann Classen, Felsental. The oral report of
the speaker is received with gratitude by the assembly.
5. Fifth Point for Deliberation: Concerning dramatic presentations
in the schools, etc. After a lengthy discussion of the subject, the
assembly accepted for further deliberation the following transition
formula: “With regard to literary evenings in the schools, the Conference
extends the confidence to our teachers (to whom we entrust the
religious-moral training of our children) that they will do that which is
proper in this and in similar questions— in every specific instance. It is
the wish of the Conference, however, that the school celebration on
Christmas Eve should bear the character of children’s worship services.
With regard to wedding parties, it is the duty of adult church
members who are close to the wedding arrangements to see to it that, on
such occasions, only that is presented which is proper, pure, and not in
contradiction to the prospective great and holy act.
6. Sixth Point for Deliberation: The next General Conference in
which representatives of all Mennonite congregations of Russia
participate is to convene, God willing, in the last half of August of the
coming year (1911) in Berdiansk. The participation of the representatives
of the Mennonite Brethren Church is envisioned for the second day of the
Conference. 36
656
MATTERS OF FAITH
7. Seventh Point for Deliberation: Four congregations report
through their representatives that resolutions have been passed in their
congregations according to which marriages between first cousins cannot
be performed any more. Several elders and ministers personally take the
stand that they do not wish to officiate any more at such marriages.
8.
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…