Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 620 (not an original page number)

Unit 620 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
s amounted to 93,510.63 rubles Preservation of Independence 655 Expenditures 51,382.87 rubles In the treasury to date: 42,127.76 rubles Note: The legacy established by Mr. Schroeder is not included in this statement. c) Concerning the appointment of a physician, of a supervisor, etc. Mr. Sudermann points out the special difficulties related to the procurement of a suitable staff. The reporter pleads to stimulate greater interest for this matter in the congregations. Note: For the time being, no definite decision is being made with regard to the level of payment for the care of the sick. Until further arrangements can be made, expenses are to be covered by voluntary contributions. 3. Third Point for Deliberation: The “Maria Deaf and Mute School” at Tiege. Reporter Mr. Jakob Schroeder, Ohrloff. He emphasizes the undisturbed and successful nature of the work. The original capital of the institution amounts to 18,000 rubles; the reserves to 10,000 rubles. The institution still depends upon voluntary support. The assembly is challenged, therefore, to continue to remember the Deaf and Mute School. 4. Fourth Point for Deliberation: Concerning our Forestry Camps. The reporter is Mr. David Johann Classen, Felsental. The oral report of the speaker is received with gratitude by the assembly. 5. Fifth Point for Deliberation: Concerning dramatic presentations in the schools, etc. After a lengthy discussion of the subject, the assembly accepted for further deliberation the following transition formula: “With regard to literary evenings in the schools, the Conference extends the confidence to our teachers (to whom we entrust the religious-moral training of our children) that they will do that which is proper in this and in similar questions— in every specific instance. It is the wish of the Conference, however, that the school celebration on Christmas Eve should bear the character of children’s worship services. With regard to wedding parties, it is the duty of adult church members who are close to the wedding arrangements to see to it that, on such occasions, only that is presented which is proper, pure, and not in contradiction to the prospective great and holy act. 6. Sixth Point for Deliberation: The next General Conference in which representatives of all Mennonite congregations of Russia participate is to convene, God willing, in the last half of August of the coming year (1911) in Berdiansk. The participation of the representatives of the Mennonite Brethren Church is envisioned for the second day of the Conference. 36 656 MATTERS OF FAITH 7. Seventh Point for Deliberation: Four congregations report through their representatives that resolutions have been passed in their congregations according to which marriages between first cousins cannot be performed any more. Several elders and ministers personally take the stand that they do not wish to officiate any more at such marriages. 8.

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…