← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 74 (not an original page number)
Unit 74 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
jesty, in order, if it please the lord, that they may be freed from their
oppressive conditions. This most noble lord further informed us that her
royal Russian Majesty not only promised them full freedom of religious
worship, but also wants to build them a church; however, her royal
Russian Majesty desires that the various Mennonite Churches be united
in one church and that Mennonites might be at liberty to intermarry.
b) “Because his most noble lordship has been given to understand
Prussia
65
that you still exercise the ban over those who marry outside the
congregation, he has asked us to petition you if it were not possible to
allow those friends, who wish to move to Kherson, to intermarry with
one another without being banned or excluded from the congregation.
We have neither been able nor have we wished to deny his most noble
lordship, the lord von Trappe, this request, all the more so because for
some time now we have ourselves been in the process of change since we
no longer feel at liberty to exclude from the congregation those who
marry outside it.
c) "In truth, brethren, if we take God’s infallible Word to counsel
we will quickly become aware that exercising the punishment of the ban
on those who choose a marriage partner outside the congregation is
much too severe. For such a person, even though he has manifested this
weakness [?], can probably be and remain a good Christian in spite of
this, for all of us fail daily in many things. Should one therefore exclude
such a person from the visible church and withhold the seal of the
covenant from him as long as he or she lives? No! For our part, because
we daily experience and become aware of how unfathomably great is
God’s love to all of mankind, we dare no longer presume to deal so coldly
and unfeelingly with our brother.
d) “That the now dead Menno Simons regarded this practice as
good in his day is another matter entirely, for at that time everything [?]
was Catholic [except for the Anabaptists]. Now, however, the difference
is very great [between then and now]. And we regard it as absolutely
permissible for true Mennonites, who are both grounded in the same
teaching, to marry one another.
e) "We beg you, therefore, dear brethren, that you will consider this
matter with one another in the fear of God. It would give us a great deal
of pleasure were we to hear in the near future that this matter had been
left to the discretion of the brethren and sisters. Finally, we remain, with
friendly best wishes that God may shed his blessing upon you personally
and your congregation, respectfully your friends and brothers in Christ.
The leaders and co-workers of the Oude Vlaamsche Doopsgezinde
Gemeente in Amsterdam. Signed by all the co-workers of the Word and
leaders of the above-named congregation, one of whom signs his name as
J. S. Seep.” [Is this not a typographical error?— should it not be
“Epp”?]
Appendix 3
We find the churches and
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…