← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 84 (not an original page number)
Unit 84 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
psge-
zinde minister. ( Zondagsbode , 1899).
a) I imagine they acted like the man with whom Frederick the Great
occasionally stayed when on maneuvers. Informed that his host, because
he was wealthy, would not accept any payment, Frederick asked him:
“Are you wealthy?” “Yes, your Majesty!” “How did you become
wealthy?” “By always paying a penny more than the market price for
everything and selling everything for a penny less.” The king deemed
the joke inappropriate, but the man explained it to him: “It is
nevertheless the absolute truth; when the grain was inexpensive I
always paid a penny more per bushel and then stored it in my granary;
when the price rose, I sold it for a penny below the current price.”
Habbertsma says the same of the Mennonites: The simplicity of their
way of life made it possible for them to be satisfied with half the
commercial profit required by the others. They were careful in their
treatment of the materials and their sorting of the goods, and punctual
in the delivery of orders. Thus they gained a high degree of
trust— something that is a prerequisite for any advantageous business
transaction. They were highly regarded by princes who understood the
well-being of their state. The House of Orange in this regard has a great
claim on our gratitude. Over the centimes, many enterprises and
industries in the Netherlands testified to the proficiency of the
Anabaptists.
b) And once they had acquired money, much money, what did they
do with it? In order to maintain their non-resistant status they were
forced to pay out huge sums. I do not wish to mention all the
pretexts— such as head money, guard money, ransom, etc.— used to
make them pay. But a few incidents from their history in Friesland are in
order. Who does not know of the three loans by the state of 1666 to 1676
amounting to a total of 1,032,943 guilders? The sum was large enough,
especially when one compares the value of the money at that time to
ours! Nothing was ever heard about a repayment.
c) They also paid out large sums of money freely. [This holds true
especially for the period 1650 and later.] This offended the more
conservative among them as well as the secular and ecclesiastical rulers
outside their circles. They resented the fact that Menno’s disciples also
wanted to share in the enjoyments of the world. The Anabaptists assumed
in their simplicity that since God had blessed their handiwork they should
78
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
be allowed, like anyone else, to enjoy the fruits of their labor: houses and
lands, furniture and art, fancy foods, all of which they regarded as
existing for them as well. This naivete on their part, however, was
maliciously interpreted by others! They should be satisfied that they
were allowed unhindered to serve their God in secret and in their own
way. But they should not be allowed to build a church on the public
highway or indulge their pleasures in any way where their paths
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…