← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 85 (not an original page number)
Unit 85 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
might
cross those of the members of the ruling [Reformed] church! How dare
they prepare fancy meals to please their palates, allow their portraits to
be painted by the best artists of the day, or let themselves be lauded in
song by the poets! Is it not going too far when one finds the finest, the
most beautiful, and best tasting things in their villas [summer homes]
and on their landed estates?! Thus Justus van Effen fires many an arrow
in their direction in his Hollaendische Geschichte [Dutch History). But
no matter how much he mocks them or of what he accuses them, he is
forced to grant to them the honor of being morally upright. And in spite
of the fact that they may have ridden in dainty carriages or beautiful
calashes according as they desired, served delicious meals, or surrounded
themselves with all the comforts their age provided, they would have no
part in the crude entertainments of their day. They spent ‘‘much
money,” 58 but in a refined manner.
d) They were indeed luxurious, and that to a high degree. Would
Galenus Abrahams de Haan , 59 that highly meritorious teacher in
Amsterdam, otherwise have found cause to castigate them? But by what
criteria are we to measure them? For, according to the opinion of some of
his own Anabaptist brothers, Galenus Abrahams was himself no
competent judge. Even he had not separated himself from the main
stream and Jan Stevens van Ryeveen [an Anabaptist writer of that time]
tauntingly accused him of having set aside his double occupation of
minister and doctor for a time to live outside the city in order to “indulge
his appetites,”— as if the man’s twofold occupation did not give him the
right to relax and recuperate! But then this same Jan Stevens was also
known as an opponent of the comforts of life and of everything that
might appear to beautify it. Defiantly he boasts that an etching or a
picture has never adorned his house, that he does not even possess a
portrayal of a biblical scene or picture of Christ. Other homes of wealthy
Mennonites were often collection centers of the choicest pieces of
classical art available at the time, and artists found friends and patrons
in the rich Mennonites. Thus far according to the Zondagsbode.
e) All of this surprises us. On the other hand, this splendid social
status was not the lot of all the Mennonites of the time. And, in spite of
everything, it must be said to the credit of the Dutch Mennonites of that
period, that they did not spend these huge sums of money on artists,
poets, scholars, and industrialists because of pressure or as a calculated
Customs and Character
79
move to impress the state, or for their honor and amusement, but their
“much money” also flowed freely in the direction of their oppressed and
persecuted fellow believers, especially to those in Switzerland, the real
vale of tears of our Anabaptist brethren till well into the 18th century.
Waldensians, too, were the recipients of their liber
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…