← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 88 (not an original page number)
Unit 88 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
t the sum of money or thing in
question and say: since we cannot come to an agreement, my brother,
keep what you have in your hands and may God bless it. Peace and
concord are more important than all the transitory goods of this world. If
the quarrel takes place in their own midst, the quarreling parties appeal
to the judgment of their ministers, and if one party is found guilty it
confesses its guilt at the next meeting of the congregation. An evil deed,
an offence, a bad habit call for other regulations and a more severe
punishment. Only one punishment is recognized by the Anabaptists'
disciplinary code: expulsion and avoidance (shunning). As soon as one
learns to know them [Michiels continues], one is constrained to love
these virtuous, moderate, benevolent people; without condemning
themselves to the monotonous and inactive life of the monastery they
have been able to stay aloof from the main causes of vice, sorrow and fear;
without stifling the personality of the individual through a communistic
system they protect one another from want and humiliation. 64 “Their
attitude toward war will sooner or later be victorious.” [From 3.e to this
point essentially according to the Beitraege and Ramseyer.]
5. Wichem’s visit with the Mennonites in the Graudenz Lowlands.
We find a most attractive and heart warming account in No. 8 of the
Mennonitische Blaetter of 1901 concerning a visit of J. H. Wichem, the
founder of homes for neglected children, “Rauhes Haus” etc., and the
so-called “father of home missions,” to the Mennonites at a time when,
at the request of the king, he was occupying an important post in the
government of the Prussian state church as a high counsellor and
member of the consistory:
a) “On the 28th of this month [October, 1862] I was accorded a
genuine pleasure. Without any substantial loss of time or too much
trouble I was able to pay a visit to the Mennonites of the Vistula
lowlands [specifically the Montau congregation] ... I wish that
everyone, who longs to associate with simple Christians in order to
gather new strength for any task in the midst of the follies of this world,
could spend an afternoon and night with these lovely people as I did. We
left the old Vistula city [Graudenz] about one o’clock noon accompanied
by several ministers and a few other friends.
b) “In the Vistula lowlands proper the sons of Menno have built
dikes and dug canals thereby making possible a better future for their
82
DUTCH-PRUSSIAN ANABAPTISTS
descendants, a future in which the latter totally forgot about the
temporal privations their forefathers suffered. Brother Dietrichsen,
whom I had brought along from Bromber, had arranged everything
extremely well. Old father Dirks was already waiting with his large,
prancing horses, while a second wagon, for the purpose of carrying the
baggage, was being driven by his stepson. The road led partially over
the dikes of the Vistula. In about an hour we were
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…