← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 96 (not an original page number)
Unit 96 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
residence,
and furniture etc., complete the profile of this new church. Aside from
these peculiarities, its members later became well-known— some even
notorious— for their excessive diligence and thrift. (“They manage then-
affairs very well,” was their reputation when we were still children.) An
attempt to have their elder ordained by Elder Janzen of the Kronsweide
Frisian church in Schoenwiese proved unsuccessful, for Janzen did not
dare to defy the threats of the “large” congregation (as the largest
Flemish contingent was often called) of the Chortitza and Molotschna
colonies. The Kleine Gemeinde, therefore, had its Elder Klaas Reimer
installed by one of the fellow-secessionist ministers. In later years even
this church was unreservedly recognized by the other churches. After
Klaas Reimer’s death in 1838, the Kleine Gemeinde once more, through
its minister Abraham Friesen, sought ordination from Elder Bernhard
Fast in Ohrloff, though once more unsuccessfully (see #58,k,l,m). We
possess no documentary evidence with regard to any further matters in
the question of ordination.
The Kleine Gemeinde was a messenger calling the Molotschna
Mennonites to repentance, but, it would appear to us, because it was too
narrow-minded, too frightened, too isolationist and opposed to education,
it never made a profound impact. “Kleengemendsch”— all those
attitudes associated with the Kleine Gemeinde— had very definite
connotations for the Molotschna Mennonites. The attempt by two elders
of the Frisian Church, who had immigrated in 1819/20— Franz Goerz
(Rudnerweide) and the “old Flemish” (Ukowallian) Peter Wedel
( Alexanderwohl), both of whom possessed a vital Christianity and
rejoiced in their state of grace— to win Klaas Reimer to their views
failed. The fact that they conceded salvation to people of other faiths,
read books written by men of other faiths, and believed in the millennium,
filled that very pious soul with such alarm that any approach was made
impossible. We must, at this point, mention a peculiar occurrence
94
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
(according to Klaas Reimer’s own notes, which we are following in all
essentials) that took place in the Kleine Gemeinde. Some of their
ministers as well as members, because of their zeal against apostasy and
the spirit of Antichrist, became extremely emotionally agitated during
their penitential sermons and practices (such as prayer, fasting and
self-castigation). Thus Reimer recounts that they would, in the dead of
winter, lie in snow-filled ditches reciting long penitential prayers, as a
consequence of which one young man died. In addition, they had dreams
and saw visions of the impending wrath, further frightening the
dreamers and their brothers and sisters. And yet they never arrived at a
joyous understanding of the forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ.
Finally, according to Reimer’s notes, the over-excited state of some (the
natural consequence of hyper-nervo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…