← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 97 (not an original page number)
Unit 97 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
us tension) led them into odious
carnal sins. Reimer never allowed himself to be carried away, offered firm
resistance, and was temporarily dismissed from office. Yet his sober
influence— though too one-sided— won the day; and for a long time he
remained the soul of the community, leaving his imprint firmly upon it.
He even regarded extemporaneous preaching to be an act of arrogance
and frivolity; he always read his own sermons, although he prepared
them hims elf
§36(2) In the 1860s the Kleine Gemeinde fell into complete disarray until,
in 1870, a part of it was reorganized under Jakob Wiebe in the Crimea as
the Krimmer (immersionist) Mennonite Brethren Church alongside the
M.B. Church of 1860. Brother Wiebe, together with his entire
congregation, emigrated to North America where they function quite
successfully alongside the older one in an ever-growing relationship as a
sister church. Wiebe, who is still alive (1910), is the first leader of this
fellowship. Many Kleine Gemeinde characteristics are still apparent in
Wiebe’s church. A segment of the Kleine Gemeinde 7 has, as it appears,
organized itself in the United States along the old lines. (Cf. further X.
“Documentary Supplement,” #58.)
§37 3. In the meantime, new disorders arose in the "large congre-
gation.” Elder Jakob Enns died in 1818 and was succeeded by Jakob
Fast of Halbstadt. A godly man, Fast was as soft and weak-willed as his
predecessor had been harsh and domineering. He died shortly, however,
weary of his thorny and burdensome office, though believing and
trusting in his God. Bernhard Fast (1821-1860) of Halbstadt and later of
Tiege succeeded him. Instead of being installed in office by the Chortitza
elder, as orthodox Flemish protocol required, he had the immigrant
Rudnerweide Frisian elder, Franz Goerz, Sr., perform the ceremony. This
factor, together with the admission of an evangelical missionary (Moritz)
to the Lord’s Supper (#59, c), the founding of a Bible Society as a branch
Unrest and Reform
95
of the Russian Bible Society of St. Petersburg (#59, d), and the founding
of a school of "higher” education 0 (the Ohrloff Association School— a
simple, single class intermediary school! cf. #59, e) provided the impetus
for the majority to disassociate itself from Elder Fast (about three-
quarters of the "large” Flemish congregation; aside from these and the
Kleine Gemeinde there also existed, since 1819/20, the Frisian Rudner-
weide congregation 4 * * * * 9 and that of the Old Flemish, Alexanderwohl. Only
about 150 families sided with Bernhard Fast). This schism occurred in
1822-24. The separatists had the Chortitza Elder Jakob Dyck, Sr., install
an elder of their own and declared themselves to be the “pure Flemish
church” (#59). Later this "large” or Lichtenau congregation again
experienced violent convulsions as a result of severe clashes with the
more progressively minded local civil Mennonite authorities, such as
Johann
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…