← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 48 (not an original page number)
Unit 48 of 54. Only the selected source passage is shown.
zhe istinnyi natsionalizm?
(Posvyashchaetsia pamyati Vladimira Seergevicha Solov'eva),"
Vo prosy filosofyi i psikhologii , XII, no. 59, pp. 507-09, as quoted
in R. Pipes, Struve. Liberal on the Left. 1870-1905 . Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1970, p. 302.
24 On conservative opposition to the "strife" of
representative government, see Pipes, p. 126.
Chapter 7
Conclusion
In the window of opportunity between 1905 and 1917, there
were signs that the evangelical movement was continuing to
grow, even to flourish. From 1907 the remnant of aristocratic
Pashkovism in St. Petersburg was under the leadership of I. S.
Prokhanov, 1 a Westinghouse engineer and thus a fitting symbol
of the changing times. Both Baptist and Evangelical
publishing and missionary efforts-multiplied; churches grew in
number and size. 2 Continuing government opposition after 1905,
in the form of new regulations for conferences (1910) and
instances of church closings and fines, for example, was a
sign of their success. 3
World War I worsened the sectarians' position, for
charges of disloyalty, pacifism, and foreign influence were
easily, albeit falsely, made. 4 The revolutionary year of 1917
and the uncertainty that followed gave them increased
opportunities for action. Yet the Bolshevik government did
not long tolerate this new religious manifestation, and the
1 Blane, p. 290.
2 For instances of these, see Blane, pp. 288-91.
3 Blane, pp. 293-98. Blane estimates that the Protestant
sectarians' numbers doubled between 1905 and 1910. They still
"represented but a fraction of one per cent of the total population
in the Russian Empire" (p. 294). He cites Klibanov's figure of
200,000 in 1917 (p. 303 and note 166).
4 Blane, pp. 299-303.
86
87
sectarians soon found themselves' in all too familiar
circumstances.
Despite the persecutions of both the tsarist and Soviet
governments, the spiritual descendants of the nineteenth-
century evangelical sectarians can be found today in the
nations of the former Soviet Union. 5 They have inherited not
only the religious faith of their predecessors; many of the
issues they and their nations face remain essentially
unchanged from those met in the encounter of evangelical
sectarianism with the Russia of the nineteenth century.
What economic structure is best for society? How far
does the right of private property extend? How should one
regard an autocratic government? Can religious freedom be
granted in an Orthodox nation? These questions for modern
Russia parallel the issues investigated in this work.
The Pashkovites and their fellow-believers addressed
these issues in a way that differed from the radical
revolutionaries on the one hand and the conservative
government on the other. The Pashkovite movement arose during
a time when much social thought was directed toward the
achievement of equality. Existing economic relations within
society were seen as ob
Source excerpts
[Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999. Исследование жизни и деятельности полковника В. А. Пашкова, ключевой фигуры протестантского движения в России конца XIX века. Анализирует его влияние на религиозные и социальные ас] Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia Jan M. Surer A thesis submitted in fulfillment of requirements for the degree of M.Phil. in Russian and East European Studies. Christ Church, Oxford, 1 May 1999 Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to the completion of this thesis. Professor G. S. Smith, my university supervisor; Dr. J. A. E. Curtis, my interim supervisor; and Rev. M. Everitt, my thesis adviser, gave generously of their time and guidance at various…