Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 168 (not an original page number)

Unit 168 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
Elder Bernhard Epp). The Rudnerweide and Gnadenfeld congregations stand in the "Frisian” ordination succession (which itself has its origin and ritual from the “Old-Flemish”): Bernard Fast, Ohrloff (ordained by Elder Franz Goerz, Sr., of Rudnerweide) commissioned Elder August Lenzmann who in turn commissioned Elder Heinrich Dirks. The same is true of the Alexanderwohl (and Waldheim) congregations: Elder Lenzmann ordained Elder Johann Schartner (Schartner in turn ordained Elder Cornelius Dirks). Thus the “Flemish” congregations of Lichtenau . . . and Pordenau have an "old-Flemish,” and the “old-Flemish” congregations a “Frisian” ordination! Even Halbstadt is in the “Frisian” ordination succession: Dirks-Gnadenfeld, Unruh-Halbstadt. Where did the Russian Mennonite ordination of elders originate, that is, from where did the Prussian Mennonites get it? Most probably from Menno Simons, Obbe Philips and Dirk Philips. (There is no official written document to this effect in existence, however.) Obbe Philips visited the Prussian Mennonites before Menno did. The “Frisian” or "Friesland” congregations certainly received their ordin- ation (or "commissioning”) from their compatriots Menno and the Philips brothers. In the last years of his life Menno had close contact with the Friesland congregations, receiving assistance from them on a regular basis (annually one-hundred Reichsthaler). The same must be assumed with regard to the separated “old-Flemish” congregations, first, because, according to the most reliable Dutch-Mennonite historical sources, they were considered to be "the strictest followers of Menno Simons,” and, secondly, because they, according to the same sources, held ordination ("commissioning”) in very high regard. Menno was personally in contact with the Prussian congregations as well as by letter (before their separation into "Flemish,” "Frisian,” “old-Flemish" and “old-Frisian”), and therefore an ordination succession beginning with Menno is also a strong possibility, indeed nearly a certainty, for the Documentary Supplement 171 “general-Flemish” group (we must always differentiate between the "Flemish,” the largest Mennonite group, and the “Old-Flemish” or “Ukowallians,” one of the smallest groups). The same can be said with equal plausibility of Obbe and Dirk Philips. (Dirk was the first elder in Prussia, an elder of the Danzig congregations, which subsequently rose to such importance that after the division the strict “Flemish,” or "Strict-ones,” were also called “Danzigers”.) Menno and Dirk Philips had both been consecrated as Anabaptist bishops or overseers by Obbe Philips (who later, however, doubted both the right and the efficacy of his consecration and consequently, as we know, withdrew completely from the Anabaptist cause); Menno had earlier been ordained as a Catholic priest and as such stood in the "apostolic succession” no worse and no better than Luther, Calvin and the oth

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…