← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 195 (not an original page number)
Unit 195 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
41. Director v. Bradky
Translation
b) To the Mennonites of the Molotschna District located in the
Berdiansk Region.
The presentation made by your leaders to the chairman of the
Supervisory Commission for Foreign Settlers of South Russia on August
16, 1848, in which you, in response to the royal manifesto of March 14,
1848, declared your willingness to furnish, gratis, 130 horses for the
military, has been taken into consideration by His Majesty the Tsar, and
the patriotic feelings expressed thereby have been accepted with special
good will. He now commands that the deepest gratitude of His Majesty
be conveyed to you as well as being brought to the attention of the
general public.
Minister of Crown Lands, Adjutant General Count P. Kisselev.
Director of the first department of Crown Lands
v. Hahn.”
(?) 1848.
(Cf. below under “Military Question.”)
D.
THE ESTABLISHMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED
CHRISTIAN ANABAPTIST
MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
(M.B. CHURCH) OF 1860 IN THE MIDST
OF THE SOUTH RUSSIAN MENNONITE
BROTHERHOOD OF DUTCH -PRUSSIAN
ORIGIN
XI.
INTRODUCTION
1. We want, as briefly as possible, to survey the course of events
which, viewed from a human perspective, brought the “M.B. Church”
into being. Although it was not our intention to write everything, we
now do so anyway: we did not think the graves old enough to be opened
calmly and in cold blood. But since the dear brethren in America have
had the courage to publish the documentary history of the “external”
events surrounding the establishment of the M.B. Church, 1 and since the
author was commissioned to write the “inner” history of the M.B.
Church, it is necessary, in order to supplement and correct the record, to
write a fuller account of what we originally intended to treat briefly or
not at all. These fundamental outlines were, at the same time, merely to
present a survey of the much more comprehensive history of the M.B.
Church to be published later. The mass of material available for an
“inner" history, both with regard to its light and dark aspects, is so
surprisingly large that few of the contemporaries, who participated in
and partially brought about these events, would believe it. A great
number of letters, documents, diaries, “reports,” “memoirs,” etc. are
available. The collection of letters (the ones he received as well as his
own) left behind by Johann Claassen of Liebenau, who died in the Kuban,
§70
201
202
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
is especially rich. These letters— as accurate as photographs— of persons
who, differing in their persuasions, were involved in the brethren
movement, characterize that movement much better than even the
official documents. It is our intention to present the most important and
essential of this material. We would see the unexpected appearance of
the American booklet by Rev. Peter Regehr (and now that long-announced
book by Rev. Franz Isaak) and, consequentl
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…