← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 333 (not an original page number)
Unit 333 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ship and that they thereby be spared from all further
persecution by local authorities and that they be assured legal freedom in
the practice of their ecclesiastical and civil rights. The original is signed:
Mennonite Johann Claassen, Liebenau Colony, Taurida Province,
Berdiansk District, Molotschna Mennonite District. St. Petersburg,
May 15, 1862, 36 Galeeren Street, House of Domontovitsch, Room F.
g) Promemoria
“Regarding the persecutions and oppressions in matters of faith,
Documentary Supplements
347
which a part of the Mennonites at the Molotschna, Province of Taurida,
District of Berdiansk, have suffered.
h) “The Mennonites of the Molotschna . . . to . . . ‘exist to this
day’ [cf. above #105).
i) "The state of affairs. In recent years, the Lord through His Spirit
aroused in many souls a desire earnestly to seek their redemption: they
began diligently to read in the Bible. This reading of Holy Scripture
aroused in many the wish to pattern their faith and life in accordance
with it, and at the same time revealed to us the present religious
decadence in our church, so that little of the truly evangelical
disposition, to which the Mennonite name owes its good reputation,
could be found. At the same time we recognized with amazement and
regret, that our church life had deteriorated to dead forms, while, with
regard to church discipline, an indulgence toward public vices was
practiced which our doctrines do not permit. More and more, this became
a subject that was often discussed by the seriously-minded, and all
recognized with clarity and certainty that this condition in our churches
did not correspond either with the teaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ,
nor with the ordinances of Menno Simons.
k) “A further natural consequence of this appeared on January 6,
1860, when a number of Mennonites from various Molotschna
congregations, at first 27 in number [the 9 members (men) from
Gnadenfeld, Reimer and others, who first expressed their consent to such
a move on January 18, are obviously added to the original 18], resolved
to organize an independent church and set themselves the obligation of
reestablishing the earlier moral purity and the true spirit of faith in the
church and in private life among the rest of their Mennonite comrades.
After the election of ministers 138 had taken place, the new congregation
immediately informed the elders of the other congregations and
explained the reasons for this decision. Unfortunately the majority of
the elders, after declaring this act to have undermined their authority,
resolved to oppose the recognition of the new group as an independent
fellowship with all the powers at their disposal, the more so since the
latter, as the expression of a moral and spiritual need already felt by
many for some time, attracted more and more participation and like-
minded people.
l) “After feeble and naturally futile attempts to dissuade the new
fellowship from th
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…